Author
Listed:
- Maduka, O. A..
- Agbarevo, M. N. B.
- Dada, O. E.
Abstract
The growth and development of most rural communities is also dependent on the activities of indigenous social groups. The efficiency of these groups is often hinged on their social capital status and their ability to interact and function collectively. The study therefore, assessed selected social capital attributes among age grades in Abia State, Nigeria with special considerations on their network and membership, trust, reciprocity, norms and values. Purposive and random sampling techniques were employed in the selection of 90 age grade members as respondents from 3 local government areas in the State that had functional age grades. Data were collected using questionnaire/interview schedule, analysed using percentages and mean and corroborated through Focus Group Discussions (FGD). Results revealed that 67.8% of the respondents indicated that membership of age grades was mostly compulsory for every adult male, 67.8% believed most members could assist them financially while 98.9% believed most members would assist in times of emergency. The result also showed that age grades had high frequency of interaction with other groups (x̅ =2.14), 94.4% of the respondents agreed there was high level of reciprocity in the group and 91.8% agreed they had high level of compliance with norms and values. The study concluded that the social capital attributes among age grades in the study area was high and this enabled them work collectively as teams to achieve theirs and communities’ goals. It therefore recommends that community leaders and stakeholders should encourage the formation of age grades and boost social capital to assist in community development.
Suggested Citation
Maduka, O. A.. & Agbarevo, M. N. B. & Dada, O. E., 2019.
"Assessment of Selected Social Capital Attributes Among Age Grade Groups in Abia State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 19(2), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347316
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347316
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.