IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ngnjrs/347217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extent of Compliance to Standard Practices by Beneficiaries and Officers of Fadama Project in Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ladele, A. A.
  • Oyelami, B. O.
  • Kehinde, M. O.
  • Agboola, O. B.

Abstract

The National Fadama Development Project (NFDP) aimed at reducing poverty by improving living conditions of the rural poor and contributing to food security. However, this was not sufficiently realized as poverty and food insecurity still persist among rural households in Nigeria with no exception to Oyo State. This connotes some anomalies among which could be poor compliance to standard practice that eventually lessened expected outcomes despite project investments. Hence, this study examined the extent of NFDP beneficiaries and officers’ compliance to standard practices in Oyo state. Multistage sampling procedure was employed to elicit information from 120 beneficiaries selected from 5 LGAs (Orelope, Ibarapa-North, Oyo-East, Ogo Oluwa and Akinyele) under the 4 ADP zones in Oyo state. Questionnaire and in-depth interview were used to obtain data which were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The mean age of respondents was 45.6 years while most (74.2%) of them were males. Majority (83%) of the beneficiaries never paid their 50% share of inputs purchase; most (97.5%) likewise maintained that Fadama User Group (FUG) members were carried along at each stage of the project. Also 91.7% of respondents disagreed that due process was abused by officials during asset procurements, however, 67.1% of them complained that supplies of input usually arrived late; insufficient finance was a major constraint to project effectiveness according to 97.5% of the respondents. Officers guided beneficiaries in project decisions without lording ideas on them as 76.7% of respondents posited. The study concluded that there was a moderately high level of compliance (56.7%) of both officers and FUGs to project’s standard practices. It recommended that project stakeholders should put in more efforts towards better compliance. Also record keeping should be encouraged among beneficiaries to facilitate evaluation while sponsors should improve fund support and ensure timeliness in documents approval, as well as release of fund for the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Ladele, A. A. & Oyelami, B. O. & Kehinde, M. O. & Agboola, O. B., 2019. "Extent of Compliance to Standard Practices by Beneficiaries and Officers of Fadama Project in Oyo State, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 19(01), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347217
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347217/files/Extent%20of%20compliance%20to%20standard%20practices%20by%20beneficiaries.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:347217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.