Author
Listed:
- Yekinni, O.T.
- Ladigbolu, T.A.
- Adebisi, S.M.
Abstract
This study investigated with the determinants of institutional involvements in conflicts resolution in Oyo state. Multistage sampling procedure was used to select 120 farmers. Variables measured were farmers’ enterprise characteristics, institutional involvement, conflicts resolution strategies employed, constraints to conflicts resolution and extent of conflicts resolution achievement. Data were collected using interview schedule and analysed with the use of descriptive and inferential (PPMC and linear regression) statistics. Results revealed that 44.2% of the respondents were large scale farmers with 28.0 mean years of farming experience. Institutions mostly involved in conflicts resolution were traditional rulers (weighted score=262.7), crop farmer groups (192.3) and local government committee (188.4). Strategies mostly employed for conflicts resolution were prayer for peace (284.8), appeased the other parties involved (266.6) and educating farmers on their interdependence with the herdsmen (265). Language barrier (291.7), lack of funds for farmers’ association to intervene (291.7), hostility (289.8) were the mostly identified constraints to conflicts resolution achievement. More (56.7%) respondents held that there was low level of conflict resolution achievement. Significant relationship existed between conflict resolution achievement and institutional involvement (r =0.98) as well as conflicts resolution strategy employed (r =0.73). Factors associated with conflicts resolution achievement were resolution strategy (β=0.11) and institutional involvement (β=0.90).Therefore, effective involvement of institutions in conflicts resolution is highly recommended to resolving disputes and ameliorating the different interests of the farmers and herdsmen.
Suggested Citation
Yekinni, O.T. & Ladigbolu, T.A. & Adebisi, S.M., 2017.
"Determinants of institutional conflicts resolution achievement among crop farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 17(01).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:285295
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.285295
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:285295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.