IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/207130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Railroad Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Bereskin, C. Gregory

Abstract

The movement of freight on railroads is subject to a number of technological characteristics that make costing of specific traffic a complex process. Among these restrictions are conditions of joint production, economies of scale, scope, and density, and a lack of data on specific expenditures related to individual freight movements. In this paper, an econometric cost model using publicly available data and methodology is developed for the examination of average and marginal costs in the industry. The model is decomposed into individual elasticity estimates for operating parameters to examine economies of scope. Finally, the size of the firm is varied through multiplying the capital stock measurements and estimating the cost behavior as firm capital stock is varied between one-quarter and two times the level of 2005. Results indicate that the railroad industry has effectively exhausted the possible economies of scale but can still gain from economies of density and scope. In addition, there appears to be little economic justification for mergers creating transcontinental railroad systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bereskin, C. Gregory, 2009. "Railroad Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density Revisited," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 48(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207130
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207130/files/2261-4266-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bereskin, C.Gregory, 2007. "Railroad Capital Stock Changes in the Post-Deregulation Period," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    2. Ivaldi, M & McCullough, G J, 2001. "Density and Integration Effects on Class I U.S. Freight Railroads," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 161-182, March.
    3. Douglas W. Caves & Laurits R. Christensen & Joseph A. Swanson, 1981. "Economic Performance in Regulated and Unregulated Environments: A Comparison of U. S. and Canadian Railroads," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 96(4), pages 559-581.
    4. Caves, Douglas W & Christensen, Laurits R & Swanson, Joseph A, 1981. "Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(5), pages 994-1002, December.
    5. John D. Bitzan & Theodore E. Keeler, 2003. "Productivity Growth and Some of Its Determinants in the Deregulated U.S. Railroad Industry," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(2), pages 232-253, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seedah, Dan & Harrison, Robert, 2010. "Measuring the Impact of Intermodal Rail Movements in State Transportation Planning," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207257, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. David Besanko & Shana Cui, 2016. "Railway restructuring and organizational choice: network quality and welfare impacts," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 164-206, October.
    3. Martland, Carl D., 2012. "Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry, 1980-2010," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(3).
    4. Martland, Carl D., 2012. "Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry 1980-2010," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207088, Transportation Research Forum.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waters II, William G., 2007. "Evolution of Railroad Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-67, January.
    2. Bereskin, C.Gregory, 2007. "Railroad Capital Stock Changes in the Post-Deregulation Period," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    3. John Bitzan & Wesley Wilson, 2007. "Industry costs and consolidation: efficiency gains and mergers in the U.S. railroad industry," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 30(2), pages 81-105, March.
    4. John Formby & James Keeler & Paul Thistle, 1988. "X-efficiency, rent-seeking and social costs," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 115-126, May.
    5. Crafts, Nicholas & Mills, Terence C. & Mulatu, Abay, 2007. "Total factor productivity growth on Britain's railways, 1852-1912: A reappraisal of the evidence," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 608-634, October.
    6. Luisa Affuso & Alvaro Angeriz & Michael Pollitt, 2009. "The Impact of Privatisation on the Efficiency of Train Operation in Britain," Working Papers 28, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    7. Zong, Yueqi & Wu, Jianhong & Yu, Kemei & Yang, Xutao, 2023. "Efficiency benchmarking and its determinants in high-speed railways: Reference for China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Forkenbrock, David J., 2001. "Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 321-337, May.
    9. Müller, Gernot, 2009. "Produktivitäts- und Effizienzmessung im Eisenbahninfrastruktursektor: Methodische Grundlagen und Schätzung des Produktivitätsfortschritts für den deutschen Markt," WIK Discussion Papers 318, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    10. Yu, Kemei & Wu, Jianhong & Wang, Kun & Zhang, Anming & Zheng, Shiyuan & Wang, Yixiao & Li, Hongchang, 2023. "Restructuring Chinese railways from a cost-efficient perspective—A hedonic cost function analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Bai, Xuejie & Jin, Zeng & Chiu, Yung-Ho, 2021. "Performance evaluation of China's railway passenger transportation sector," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. James Uguccioni, 2016. "Estimating Total Factor Productivity Growth: Canadian Freight Railways, 1986 to 2009," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 30, pages 77-97, Spring.
    13. Cantos Sánchez, P., 2001. "Vertical relationships for the European railway industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 77-83, April.
    14. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Shuji Uranishi, 2013. "Does vertical separation reduce cost? An empirical analysis of the rail industry in European and East Asian OECD Countries," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 31-59, January.
    15. Bitzan, John, 2000. "Railroad Cost Conditions: Implications for Policy," UGPTI Department Publication 231804, North Dakota State University, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute.
    16. Zou, Bo & Hansen, Mark, 2012. "Impact of operational performance on air carrier cost structure: Evidence from US airlines," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1032-1048.
    17. Lachaal, Lassaad & Chebil, Ali & Dhehibi, Boubaker, 2005. "Measuring factor substitution and technological change in the Tunisian agricultural sector, 1971 - 2000," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11.
    18. Ricardo Gonçalves & Pedro Pita Barros, 2013. "Economies of scale and scope in the provision of diagnostic techniques and therapeutic services in Portuguese hospitals," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 415-433, February.
    19. Malikov, Emir & Hartarska, Valentina, 2018. "Endogenous scope economies in microfinance institutions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 162-182.
    20. Aldona Jarašūnienė & Gintaras Sinkevičius & Kristina Čižiūnienė & Audrius Čereška, 2020. "Adaptation of the Management Model of Internationalization Processes in the Development of Railway Transport Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.