Author
Listed:
- Emiko, Mercy
- Nwali, Collins Sunday
- Amuwah, Victor Onuorah
- Agude, Terngohol
Abstract
This study determined the socio-economic effects of Fulani and farmers conflict on maize farmers’ output in Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State. Objectives of this study were to; describe the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, identify the causes of the herdsmen-farmers conflict, determine the output differences before, during and after conflict and identify the farmer’s perceived solution to end conflict in the study area. Multi stage sampling technique was used to select 120 respondents for this study. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to realize the objectives of the study. The results on socio economic characteristics of the respondents showed that 32.5% of the respondents were between the age of 45-54 years, majority (75.8%) of the respondents were male, most (66.7%) of the respondents were married. 33.3 % of the respondents had secondary education, most (68.3%)of the respondents had farming as their secondary occupation, majority (73.3%) of the respondent had 1-10 years of farming experience, majority (60.0%) of the respondents were not have access to extension services, majority (79.2%) of the respondents earn 10,000-50,000, 51.7% of the respondents were Christians, most (62.5%) of the respondents had 1-5 households, majority (92.5%) of the respondents had 1-5 farm size, most (60.8%) of the respondents were member of cooperative society, 38.3% of the respondents inherited their farmland. The result on causes of the herdsmen-farmers conflict showed that majority (81.7%) experience conflict between farmers and herdsmen, 91.7% of the respondents experienced negative effect of the conflict on maize production, destruction of maize by cattle (36.7%) and killing of farmers (31.7%), as the main causes of the conflict in the study area. The results on output differences before, during and after conflict revealed that farmers produced average of 1,235 (kg/tons), 1,198(kg/tons) and 1,029 (kg/tons) of maize before, during and after the conflict respectively. Also, farmers spent ₦2,677, ₦2,497 and ₦2,389 on maize production (kg/tons) before, during and after the conflict respectively. Moreover, farmers sold maize (kg/tons) for ₦2,500, ₦1,882 and ₦1,777 before, during and after the conflict respectively. Results on perceived solution to end conflict were: government should provide adequate security (40.0%) and making of rules and regulations that will guide grazing (33.3%). Results also revealed that there is significant relationship between the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers and their maize output. From the findings of this study, it is recommended that to prevent further community clashes in farming communities, government and relevant agencies should collaborate with traditional institutions to settle rivalries amicably among parties before it degenerates into serious security challenge. Also, government should provide palliative to the affected farmers in the study area as this will cushion the effect of conflict on them.
Suggested Citation
Emiko, Mercy & Nwali, Collins Sunday & Amuwah, Victor Onuorah & Agude, Terngohol, 2023.
"Socio Economic Effects of Fulani and Farmers’ Conflict on Maize Farmers’ Output in Akinyele Local Government Area of Oyo State,"
Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 10(1), June.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:naprej:343419
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343419
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:343419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aprneea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.