Author
Listed:
- Nwafor, S.C.
- Wegh, F.S.
- Ikwuba, A.A.
- Jacob, A.A.
Abstract
The study assessed the agricultural marketing extension services’ needs of root and tuber crop farmers in Abia State , Nigeria . It describe d the socio economic characteristics of root and tuber crop farmers and identified the marketing extension services’ needs of root and tuber crop farmers in the state ; it ascertained the marketing measures through which farmers’ needs can be met . It employed public opinion survey using a structured questionnaire as instrument for data collect ion. It used a multistage sampling technique to select a sample of three hundred and eighty seven ( farmers . Descriptive analysis was adopted in analyzing the data collected. The findings showed that farmers were constantly in need of updated marketing extension services which include cooperatives ( x ̅ = 2.49), credit (x ̅ = 2.47), information (x ̅ = 2.77), market linkage (x ̅ = 2.91), storage ((x ̅ = 2.97), processing ((x ̅ = 2.86),, transportation ((x ̅ = 2.63),, programme to expand consumption((x ̅ = 2.68) and grading and standardization services (x ̅ = 2.67). Therefore, for extension workers to really assist farmers in this regard, it is important to assess from the farmer ‘s perspective the areas in which assistance is needed for root and tuber produce marketing . This is because program me s and services can be effective only when they meet real needs. It was recommended that organizations and agencies providing marketing extension services (ADPs, Research institutes, Universities, NGOs etc) should do so in accordance with famers’ needs. Governments should develop, support and promote training in marketing skills and services for farmers in the study area.
Suggested Citation
Nwafor, S.C. & Wegh, F.S. & Ikwuba, A.A. & Jacob, A.A., 2018.
"Marketing Extension Services’ Needs of Root and Tuber Crop Farmers in Abia State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 5(01), September.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:naprej:313829
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313829
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:313829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aprneea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.