IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jrpieb/128651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some methodological issues of technology roadmapping experienced during consultancy

Author

Listed:
  • Pataki, Bela
  • Szalkai, Zsuzsanna
  • Biro-Szigeti, Szilvia

Abstract

The authors share some of their methodological recommendations based on their TRM-consultancy experience. They recommend: (1) using an ‘environment’ dimension of analysis (i.e. layer of the roadmap) instead of just ‘market’, (2) avoiding the usage of the popular oversimplified version of SWOT analysis instead of the full version, (3) using weighting scales based on the ‘magical number seven plus-minus two’ rule by Miller for quantifying the relations between the units of the TRM-analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Pataki, Bela & Szalkai, Zsuzsanna & Biro-Szigeti, Szilvia, 2011. "Some methodological issues of technology roadmapping experienced during consultancy," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 9(3), pages 1-5, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jrpieb:128651
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.128651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/128651/files/02_PIEB_Vol9_Issue3_Pataki_et_al_Technology_roadmapping_pp.12-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.128651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Si-Nuo Li & Yi Li & Winnie Yu, 2023. "Assessing the Content Quality of Industry Technology Roadmaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jrpieb:128651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pradecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.