IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects Of Water Rights And Irrigation Technology On Streamflow Augmentation Cost In The Snake River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Willis, David B.
  • Caldas, Jose Vaz
  • Frasier, W. Marshall
  • Wittlesey, Norman K.
  • Hamilton, Joel R.

Abstract

Three species of salmon in the Snake River Basin have been listed as endangered. Recovery efforts for these fish include attempts to obtain increased quantities of water during smolt migration periods to improve habitat in the lower basin. Agriculture is the dominant user of surface flows in this region. This study investigates farmer cost of a contingent water contract requiring the agricultural release of stored irrigation supplies in low flow years during critical flow periods. Results show that contingent contracts can provide substantial quantities of water at a relatively modest cost without significantly affecting the agricultural base of the area.

Suggested Citation

  • Willis, David B. & Caldas, Jose Vaz & Frasier, W. Marshall & Wittlesey, Norman K. & Hamilton, Joel R., 1998. "The Effects Of Water Rights And Irrigation Technology On Streamflow Augmentation Cost In The Snake River Basin," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31177
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31177/files/23010225.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huffaker, Ray G. & Whittlesey, Norman K., 1995. "Agricultural Water Conservation Legislation: Will It Save Water?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 10(4), pages 1-5.
    2. Joel R. Hamilton & Norman K. Whittlesey & Philip Halverson, 1989. "Interruptible Water Markets in the Pacific Northwest," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(1), pages 63-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiueh, Y. & Chen, M. C., 2003. "An economic analysis of Taiwan water market and water bank establishment," IWMI Books, Reports H033354, International Water Management Institute.
    2. William K. Jaeger & Raymond Mikesell, 2002. "Increasing Streamflow To Sustain Salmon And Other Native Fish In The Pacific Northwest," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 20(4), pages 366-380, October.
    3. Jaeger, William K., 2004. "Conflicts over Water in the Upper Klamath Basin and the Potential Role for Market-Based Allocations," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. KLAUS ABBINK & MOLLER, Lars Christian & SARAH O'HARA, 2005. "The Syr Darya River Conflict: An Experimental Case Study," Discussion Papers 2005-14, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    2. repec:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:433-461 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michelsen, Ari M. & Taylor, R. Garth & Huffaker, Ray G. & McGuckin, J. Thomas, 1999. "Emerging Agricultural Water Conservation Price Incentives," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Klaus Abbink & Lars Moller & Sarah O’Hara, 2010. "Sources of Mistrust: An Experimental Case Study of a Central Asian Water Conflict," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 283-318, February.
    5. Zeyu Wang & Juqin Shen & Fuhua Sun & Zhaofang Zhang & Dandan Zhang & Yizhen Jia & Kaize Zhang, 2019. "A Pricing Model for Groundwater Rights in Ningxia, China Based on the Fuzzy Mathematical Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Kovacs, Kent F. & Wailes, Eric & West, Grant & Popp, Jennie & Bektemirov, Kuatbay, 2014. "Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Groundwater Conservation and Surface Water Quality with On-Farm Reservoirs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1-28, November.
    7. repec:bla:canjag:v:58:y:2010:i:s1:p:403-409 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Huang, Qiuqiong & Wang, Jinxia & Li, Yumin, 2017. "Do water saving technologies save water? Empirical evidence from North China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Kent Kovacs & Grant West, 2016. "The Influence of Groundwater Depletion from Irrigated Agriculture on the Tradeoffs between Ecosystem Services and Economic Returns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Francesco Prota, 2002. "Water Resources And Water Policies," Working Papers 8_2002, D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    11. Robert R. Hearne & K. William Easter, 1997. "The economic and financial gains from water markets in Chile," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 187-199, January.
    12. Lambert, David K. & Shaw, W. Douglass, 1998. "Alternative Use Values Within A Watershed Under Transitory Supply Shocks," Discussion Papers 12955, University of Nevada at Reno, Department of Resource Economics.
    13. Chatterjee, Bishu & Howitt, Richard E. & Sexton, Richard J., 1998. "The Optimal Joint Provision of Water for Irrigation and Hydropower," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 295-313, November.
    14. Kristiana Hansen & Jonathan Kaplan & Stephan Kroll, 2014. "Valuing Options in Water Markets: A Laboratory Investigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(1), pages 59-80, January.
    15. Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb, 2000. "Water market institutions: lessons from Colorado," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(01), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Ding, Ya & Peterson, Jeffrey M., 2012. "Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Water Conservation Policies in a Depleting Aquifer: A Dynamic Analysis of the Kansas High Plains," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 223-234, May.
    17. William K. Jaeger & Raymond Mikesell, 2002. "Increasing Streamflow To Sustain Salmon And Other Native Fish In The Pacific Northwest," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 20(4), pages 366-380, October.
    18. Zekri, Slim & Easter, William, 2005. "Estimating the potential gains from water markets: a case study from Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 161-175, April.
    19. Hansen, Kristiana & Howitt, Richard & Williams, Jeffrey, 1988. "Implementing Options Markets in California To Manage Water Supply Uncertainty," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270393, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Schaible, Glenn D. & Gollehon, Noel R. & Kramer, Mark S. & Aillery, Marcel P. & Moore, Michael R., 1995. "Economic Analysis of Selected Water Policy Options for the Pacific Northwest," Agricultural Economic Reports 308426, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    21. Michelsen, Ari M. & McGuckin, J. Thomas & Taylor, R. Garth & Huffaker, Ray G., 1998. "Irrigation District Adoption Of Water Conserving Rate Structures," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20964, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    22. Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb & Gillitt, C.G. & Backeberg, G.R., 2005. "Water marketing in the Crocodile River, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource/Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.