IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/287989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Conservation Practice Adoption in the Northern Great Plains: Economic versus Stewardship Motivations

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Tong
  • Jin, Hailong
  • Kasu, Bishal B.
  • Jacquet, Jeffrey
  • Kumar, Sandeep

Abstract

By making adoption decisions on soil conservation practices, agricultural producers play a key role in reversing unintended consequences caused by soil degradation. This paper studies two soil conservation practices—diversified crop rotation (DCR) and integrated cropping and livestock system (ICLS)—using survey data collected from Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota producers. We estimate a bivariate probit model to identify factors affecting adoption decisions. Farmers’ requirements for monetary incentives and values on soil health were found to be important determinants of adoption behavior. Geographic location matters, as North Dakota had the highest DCR adoption rate yet the lowest ICLS adoption rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Kasu, Bishal B. & Jacquet, Jeffrey & Kumar, Sandeep, 2019. "Soil Conservation Practice Adoption in the Northern Great Plains: Economic versus Stewardship Motivations," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 44(2), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:287989
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.287989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/287989/files/JARE%2C44.2%2CMay2019%2C%2310%2CWang%2C404-421.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.287989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Xin & Zhou, Xiaohe & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2022. "Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Obembe, Oladipo S. & Wang, Tong & Shew, Aaron M., 2023. "Effect of Conservation Practice Adoption on Perceived Changes in Production Cost and Yield in South Dakota," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    3. Huang, Weilun & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "Selecting the optimal economic crop in minority regions with the criteria about soil and water conservation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Palm-Forster, Leah H. & Taylor, Mykel & Banerjee, Simanti & Xie, Lusi, 2023. "Factors influencing enrollment of leased cropland in the Conservation Stewardship Program in Kansas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Chowdhury, Iftekhar Uddin Ahmed & Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Smart, Alexander J., 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Benefits of Rotational Grazing in the U. S. Great Plains," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304487, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Wang, Tong & Xu, Zheng & Kolady, Deepthi & Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. & Clay, David, 2020. "Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(2), August.
    7. Pratt, Bryan & Tanner, Sophia & Thornsbury, Suzanne, 2021. "Behavioral Factors in the Adoption and Diffusion of USDA Innovations," Miscellaneous Publications 338293, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Adam, Baba & Abdulai, Awudu, 2022. "Heterogeneity in the Impact of Conservation Agriculture Practices on Farm Performance and Inorganic Fertilizer Use in Ghana," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:287989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.