Author
Abstract
The legal consequences of the precautionary principle (PP)have been, for several years, the cause of much controversy. We will not go back over these debates which, certainly, would not help clarify the legal indeed, even civilian considerations. To stick to the assigned title, we shall skim through the legal aspects of the PP in an attempt to present developments on the matter, developments which may appear, either very slow and worrying for some, or too fast but just as worrying for others. Rather than reasoning in terms of a swift propagation of the PP or in terms of reservation with regard to its acknowledgement or non acknowledgement, we thought it wiser to present, in concrete terms, the legal considerations of the PP on the part of the different authorities. In doing so, not only do we have in mind the practical confirmation of the PP by the authorities “making” the law, i.e. the “lawmakers”, in a general sense, but also the administrative independent authorities and “judges”. By standing in favour of the PP, we believe that the report is somewhat discouraging from a national point of view whereas it is more encouraging from a European perspective. The genuine advances in this field are neither French nor international but come from the European community with, yet, a serious reserve.
Suggested Citation
Boy, Laurence, 2005.
"Taking into account the legal considerations of the precautionary principle,"
INRAE Sciences Sociales, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (INRAE), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2), vol. 2004, pages 1-2, January.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:inrass:162493
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162493
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inrass:162493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.