IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inijae/343365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions of Regional Disparity in Sustainable Agricultural Development of Gujarat

Author

Listed:
  • Ghabru, Mahima Gopal
  • Devi, Ganga

Abstract

Sustainable Livelihood Security Index (SLSI) was constructed for 26 districts of Gujarat for the TE 2013-14 using the Prem Narain methodology. The districts were classified according to different levels of development based on SLSI using fractile classification. Rajkot, Ahmedabad, Surat, Banaskantha were found to be highly developed while Anand, Kheda, Jamnagar, Bhavnagar were medium developed and Dahod, Bharuch, Dangs, Patan, Porbandar were low developed districts according to SLSI. The study puts forth that regional disparity exists among districts of Gujarat in terms of ecology, economy and equity where the developed districts of state rank high but the tribal belt fares poorly in sustainable agricultural development. Model districts have been identified to bring about uniform development among low ranking districts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghabru, Mahima Gopal & Devi, Ganga, 2018. "Dimensions of Regional Disparity in Sustainable Agricultural Development of Gujarat," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(02), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:343365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343365/files/Dimensions%20of%20Regional%20Disparity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainability;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:343365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.