IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/175051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of occupational health service programmes in farmers’ safety and security risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Leppälä, Jarkko
  • Kauranen, Ilkka
  • Rautiainen, Risto

Abstract

Occupational health service programmes aim to reduce injury and illness risks. Yet, recent studies indicate that members of the voluntary Farmers’ Occupational Health Service programme (FOHS) in Finland have filed more occupational injury and disease claims than non-members. To investigate this unexpected finding further, we conducted a safety risk management survey among farmers (n=591). We used multivariable regression to evaluate the differences in injury incident reporting between FOHS members and non-members while controlling for demographic, risk perception, and management practice variables. We found that FOHS members were significantly younger, had larger farms, and had more livestock than non-members. Similar to recent studies, FOHS members reported 1.5 times more injury incidents compared to non-members. However, when controlling for farm size, dependence on one person, physical strain at work, and injuries to family members, there was no significant difference in injury incidence between FOHS members and non-members. In some models, FOHS had a protective but non-significant effect. While no consistent protective effect was found on injuries, FOHS members reported greater awareness of risks and greater effort in controlling risks. Regular self-monitoring of safety had a protective effect on injury incidents. A crucial challenge in FOHS and similar risk management programmes is how to ensure farmers and managers commit to the practical implementation of the programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Leppälä, Jarkko & Kauranen, Ilkka & Rautiainen, Risto, 2013. "Effectiveness of occupational health service programmes in farmers’ safety and security risk management," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(3), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:175051
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.175051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175051/files/130_Leppala.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.175051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Bennett & Stefan Schaltegger & Dimitar Zvezdov, 2011. "Environmental Management Accounting," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Magdy G. Abdel-Kader (ed.), Review of Management Accounting Research, chapter 3, pages 53-84, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leppälä, Jarkko & Rautiainen, Risto & Kauranen, Ilkka, 2015. "Analysis of risk management tools applicable in managing farm risks: A literature review," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(3), April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dobos, Imre & Vörösmarty, Gyöngyi, 2014. "Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 273-278.
    2. Bryan DUFOUR & Francesca PETRELLA & Nadine RICHEZ-BATTESTI, 2020. "Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory: A comparative analysis on work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in France and Denmark," CIRIEC Working Papers 2012, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    3. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    4. Doorasamy Mishelle & Baldavaloo Kiran, 2016. "Compromising Long-Term Sustainability for Short-Term Profit Maximization: Unethical Business Practice," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92, January.
    5. Hamad Alhumoudi, 2017. "External Social Accounting Developments: Analysis and Discussion of Academic Critiques," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 33-45, June.
    6. Bryan Dufour & Francesca Petrella & Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2020. "Understanding social impact assessment through public value theory: A comparative analysis on work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in France and Denmark," Working Papers halshs-03216401, HAL.
    7. Dufour, Bryan, 2019. "Social impact measurement: What can impact investment practices and the policy evaluation paradigm learn from each other?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 18-30.
    8. Doorasamy Mishelle, 2015. "Staircase To Sustainable Development," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 53-70, June.
    9. Tello, Mario A., 2020. "Conceptualizing social impact: A geographic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 562-571.
    10. Susan van Schie & Arthur Gautier & Anne-Claire Pache & Stefan T. Güntert, 2019. "What Keeps Corporate Volunteers Engaged: Extending the Volunteer Work Design Model with Self-determination Theory Insights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 693-712, December.
    11. Pier Luigi Marchini & Luca Fornaciari, 2016. "The increasing relevance of managing costs of poor quality (CoPQ). The case of the mineral water industry," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(3), pages 65-96.
    12. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    13. Matthias Staessens & Pieter Jan Kerstens & Johan Bruneel & Laurens Cherchye, 2019. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Social Enterprises: Analysing Performance, Strategic Orientation and Mission Drift," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 325-341, October.
    14. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:121 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Settanni, Ettore & Newnes, Linda B. & Thenent, Nils E. & Parry, Glenn & Goh, Yee Mey, 2014. "A through-life costing methodology for use in product–service-systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 161-177.
    16. Arena, Marika & Bengo, Irene & Calderini, Mario & Chiodo, Veronica, 2018. "Unlocking finance for social tech start-ups: Is there a new opportunity space?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 154-165.
    17. Nicolas Antheaume, 2012. "Essai Sur La Specificite Du Controle De Gestion Environnemental," Post-Print hal-00691066, HAL.
    18. Laura Laguna-Salvadó & Matthieu Lauras & Uche Okongwu & Tina Comes, 2019. "A multicriteria Master Planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1303-1343, December.
    19. Brzustewicz, Paweł & Escher, Iwona & Hatami, Akram & Hermes, Jan & Keränen, Anne & Ulkuniemi, Pauliina, 2022. "Emergence of social impact in company–NGO relationships in corporate volunteering," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 62-75.
    20. Florian Findler & Norma Schönherr & Rodrigo Lozano & Barbara Stacherl, 2018. "Assessing the Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development—An Analysis of Tools and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    21. Michael Bamidele Fakoya & Emmanuel O. Imuezerua, 2021. "Improving water pricing decisions through material flow cost accounting model: a case study of the Politsi Water Treatment Scheme in South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2243-2260, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:175051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.