IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijag24/344911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Matrix of the impact assessment of intervention measures on agricultural production sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Bezat-Jarzębowska, Agnieszka
  • Rembisz, Vladimir

Abstract

The aim of the article was to show the possibilities of using matrix calculus to determine the links and direct and indirect impact of selected sectoral intervention measures on agriculture. The reasoning was divided into four stages. The starting point, the first stage of the study, was mapping the links between intervention measures and agricultural production sectors. The article analysed nine different intervention instruments and four agricultural product sectors. In the second stage of the study, the share of each intervention measure in the production of a given sector was estimated. This allowed for the assessment of the impact of these measures on the sectors. The third stage of the study consisted in determining the direct and indirect effect of intervention measures on given agricultural production sectors. In the last stage, the share of the value of intervention measures in the value of commercial production in a given sector was assessed. The entire research process allowed for a quantitative assessment of the impact of intervention measures on agricultural production sectors. In terms of content, the following general conclusions can be drawn based on such an approach. First, horizontal income measures are of key importance in the context of income support in the sectors studied. Secondly, although the impact of individual actions on the sectors studied is considered individually as at most sufficient or insignificant, the combined impact of these actions on individual sectors is significant. Thirdly, there is a certain logical relationship in the formation of the map of the impact of actions on sectors. The most support is provided to sectors that are both sensitive to changes in the economic conditions of production and important for the ecological system of agricultural production, where returning to production may be more difficult, and support for resilience and stability is particularly needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bezat-Jarzębowska, Agnieszka & Rembisz, Vladimir, 2024. "Matrix of the impact assessment of intervention measures on agricultural production sectors," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 201(4), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344911
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344911/files/3_Bezat-Jarzebowska_Rembisz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wieliczko, Barbara, 2018. "System oceny wsparcia programów rozwoju obszarów wiejskich 2014-2020," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 18(33, Part ), March.
    2. Roberto Esposti & Franco Sotte, 2013. "Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and rural policies: an introduction," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(4), pages 535-539, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Wuepper & Robert Finger, 2023. "Regression discontinuity designs in agricultural and environmental economics," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(1), pages 1-28.
    2. Jaehee Hwang & Jonghoon Park & Seongwoo Lee, 2018. "The Impact of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Rural Sustainability in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Pia Nilsson & Sofia Wixe, 2022. "Assessing long-term effects of CAP investment support on indicators of farm performance," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(4), pages 760-795.
    4. Robert Finger & Nadja El Benni, 2021. "Farm income in European agriculture: new perspectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(2), pages 253-265.
    5. Giuseppe Gargano & Francesco Licciardo & Milena Verrascina & Barbara Zanetti, 2021. "The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030—Some Evidence from the Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Zuzana Bednaříková, 2015. "Evaluation of the Impacts of Rural Development Policy Measures on the Local Economy in the Czech Republic," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(4), pages 416-433.
    7. Cristina SALVIONI & Dario SCIULLI, 2018. "Rural development policy in Italy: the impact of growth-oriented measures on farm outcomes," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(3), pages 115-130.
    8. Roberto Esposti, 2022. "The Coevolution of Policy Support and Farmers' Behaviour. An investigation on Italian agriculture over the 2008-2019 period," Working Papers 464, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    9. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2021. "Exploring the regional efficiency of the Swedish agricultural sector during the CAP reforms ‒ multi-directional efficiency analysis approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Eunji Choi & Jonghoon Park & Seongwoo Lee, 2020. "The Effect of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Farm Income in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Production Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.