Author
Listed:
- Ullah, M.H.
- Khan, M.M.H.
- Das, G.P.
- Faruq, M.O.
- Hossain, M.N.
Abstract
Experiment was carried out in the farmer’s field at Sonakhali, Barguna sadar, Barguna district of Bangladesh during January to April 2018 to evaluate the effectiveness of different IPM packages against pod borer complex of mungbean. Results revealed that the lowest number of pod borer (1.33/m2), the highest percent (93.56%) pod borer reduction over control, lowest pod damaged (5.33/m2), highest percent (87.70%) pod damaged reduction over control at 65 DAS were recorded in Package 5 (Bioneem plus 1% EC @ 1 mL/l of water + sex pheromone trap) treated plots. The highest yield (1,416 kg/ha), percent yield increase over control (40.26%), highest net return come (Tk. 23,146/ha) and highest marginal benefit cost ratio (4.35) were obtained from Package 3 (Sex pheromone trap + white sticky trap) treated plots followed by Package 5 (1,319 kg/ha and 27.33%) and the lowest yield (1,010 kg/ha) from untreated control. From this experiment Package 3 (Sex pheromone trap + White sticky trap) was found to be the best integrated management package for the suppression of pod borer complex and produced maximum yield of mungbean. Integration of IPM components revealed that installation of sex pheromone trap along with white sticky trap (package 3) was found to be the best IPM package for the management pod borer complex producing maximum yield and providing highest marginal benefit cost ratio of mungbean.
Suggested Citation
Ullah, M.H. & Khan, M.M.H. & Das, G.P. & Faruq, M.O. & Hossain, M.N., 2022.
"Effectiveness of Integrated Management Packages Against Pod Borer Complex on Mungbean,"
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 2(1), May.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ijag24:340596
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340596
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:340596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.