IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/284911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits and pitfalls of social capital for farmer cooperatives: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Yining
  • Liang, Qiao
  • Huang, Zuhui

Abstract

This paper conducts an exploratory analysis on the role of social capital in influencing both economic and social performance of farmer cooperatives based on a sample of 156 farmers from 54 vegetable cooperatives in China’s Hebei and Zhejiang provinces. Social capital is distinguished into bonding and bridging dimensions, with the former referring to the internal aspect of social capital and the latter the external “Guanxi” (meaning relationship) possessed by core members. The statistical results display that specific dimensions of social capital may not deliver the benefits expected by cooperative practitioners and academics. Both positive and negative effects of social capital on performances of farmer cooperatives are observed. To be specific, bonding social capital is positively associated with common members’ economic benefits. Bridging social capital generates beneficial outcomes for the financial and social performances of cooperatives, while exhibiting negative influence on common members’ income increase because of member heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Yining & Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui, 2018. "Benefits and pitfalls of social capital for farmer cooperatives: evidence from China," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(8), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:284911
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284911/files/Yininh%20Xu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Qu & Jing Zhang & Zhenning Wang & Xinning Ma & Guangcheng Wei & Xiangzhi Kong, 2023. "The Future of Agriculture: Obstacles and Improvement Measures for Chinese Cooperatives to Achieve Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Yuying Liu & Ziqi Liu & Jingzheng Liu & Ling Qiu & Yulin Wang & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Members’ Social Capital within Agricultural Cooperatives on Their Adoption of IPM in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Lee, Hsui-Yu & Liu, Chi-Fang & Lin, Chien-Ho, 2020. "Intellectual capital for green accounting in agribusiness," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(5), March.
    4. Guangcheng Wei & Xiangzhi Kong & Yumeng Wang, 2022. "Will Joining Cooperative Promote Farmers to Replace Chemical Fertilizers with Organic Fertilizers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Yang Xu & Yujia Huo & Xiangyu Guo, 2024. "Relationship of Arable Land Scale and High-Quality Development of Farmers’ Cooperatives: Evidence from Grain Production Cooperatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Liyan Yu & Jerker Nilsson, 2019. "Social Capital and Financial Capital in Chinese Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Bo Wang & Po-Yuan Cheng & Brian Lee & Lih-Chyun Sun & Hung-Hao Chang, 2019. "Does Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives Affect Farm Sustainability? Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Karin Hakelius & Jerker Nilsson, 2020. "The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s Largest Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Bismark Addai & Zhao Ding & Abbas Ali Chandio & Prince Fosu & Dennis Asante & Anthony Siaw & Frank Osei Danquah & Bright Asiamah Korankye & Gideon Ntim-Amo, 2021. "The Impact of Cooperative Membership on Fish Farm Households’ Income: The Case of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Menglu Li & Shemei Zhang & Nawab Khan, 2024. "Do farmers' professional cooperatives improve agricultural technical efficiency? Evidence using a national‐level dataset of China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 363-383, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:284911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.