Author
Listed:
- Fani, Djomo Choumbou Raoul
- Tabetando, Rayner
- Nathanel, Ndaghu Ndonkeu
- Henrietta, Ukpe Udeme
- Nkwi, Gama Emmanuel
- Divine, Esuh Nnoko
- Sani, Mohammadou
- Sumaka, Chahul Emmanuel
- Emmanuel, Oben Njock
Abstract
In this study, demand-side variables affecting the use of institutional finance with small-scale growers of roots and tubers profitability in Cameroon’s southwest are investigated. Using a multi-step stratified and straightforward random sample process, 837 respondents were chosen. In study was found that as farm size grows, so does the likelihood of loan need. A farmer with more years of farming expertise has more opportunities to use and demand finance. Credit institutions are more willing to lend to couples because they believe they will be able to repay the loans collectively. Educated farmers are certain that using borrowing to grow their investment will yield output that will cover their loan repayments due to their knowledge of production processes and record keeping. Further, the profitability of institutional credit users for cassava, cocoyam, and yam was higher than that of non-users of institutional credit. New techniques for identifying financially disadvantaged rural poor in the Region should be created by focusing on metrics that would increase the efficiency of entrepreneurs and take them closer to the production frontier. One of these solutions may be for the government to encourage microfinance institutions to lend to businesses in the form of inputs rather than cash.
Suggested Citation
Fani, Djomo Choumbou Raoul & Tabetando, Rayner & Nathanel, Ndaghu Ndonkeu & Henrietta, Ukpe Udeme & Nkwi, Gama Emmanuel & Divine, Esuh Nnoko & Sani, Mohammadou & Sumaka, Chahul Emmanuel & Emmanuel, Ob, 2022.
"Evaluating demand side factors that affect institutional credit use and profitability of small-scale growers of roots and tubers: evidence from Cameroon's South West region,"
Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 4(2), December.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:iepwbj:329667
DOI: 10.5937/WBJAE2202149C
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepwbj:329667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.