IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/146101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welche zusätzlichen ethischen Eigenschaften ökologischer Lebensmittel interessieren Verbraucher?

Author

Listed:
  • Zander, Katrin
  • Hamm, Ulrich

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag geht der Frage nach, welche ethischen Werte ökologisch erzeugter Lebensmittel, die über die Anforderungen der EU-Verordnung zum ökologischen Landbau hinausgehen, für die Kaufentscheidung von Verbrauchern von Interesse sind. Mit Hilfe eines Beobachtungsverfahrens, der Informations- Display-Matrix (IDM), und einer begleitenden Verbraucherbefragung wurde in fünf europäischen Ländern das Informationssuchverhalten von Verbrauchern bezüglich zusätzlicher ethischer Werte ökologischer Lebensmittel untersucht. Unter sieben getesteten ethischen Wertkategorien stellten ‚Artgerechte Tierhaltung’, ‚Regionale Erzeugung’ und ‚Faire Preise für Landwirte’ die wichtigsten Kriterien dar. Ein weiteres Ergebnis ist, dass Verbraucher eine erhöhte Zahlungsbereitschaft für zusätzliche ethische Werte haben. Erzeuger von Öko-Lebensmitteln sind folglich gut beraten, die Einhaltung höherer Standards in Bezug auf die artgerechte Tierhaltung, regionale Erzeugung und faire Erzeugerpreise deutlich stärker als bisher umzusetzen und in den Mittelpunkt ihrer Kommunikation zu stellen. Aus methodischer Sicht hat sich die IDM als Instrument zur Reduzierung des Problems der sozialen Erwünschtheit der Antworten als gut geeignet erwiesen. This contribution determines the relevance of ethical attributes of organic food exceeding the EU regulation on organic farming for consumers’ purchase decisions. The information acquisition behaviour of consumers regarding additional ethical values of organic food was analysed by means of an Information-Display- Matrix (IDM)and an accompanying consumer survey in five European countries. Seven ethical attributes were tested of which ‘animal welfare’, ‘regional production’ and ‘fair prices for farmers’ were identified to be most important. Consumers showed an increased willingness to pay for organic food with these additional ethical attributes. Thus, producers of organic food should increasingly focus on additional ethical attributes such as ‘animal welfare’, ‘local production’ and ‘fair prices for farmers’ in production and communication with consumers. With respect to the methodology used, the IDM turned out to be helpful in reducing the problem of social desirability of answers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zander, Katrin & Hamm, Ulrich, 2010. "Welche zusätzlichen ethischen Eigenschaften ökologischer Lebensmittel interessieren Verbraucher?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(04), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:146101
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.146101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/146101/files/2_Zander.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.146101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weinrich, Ramona & Kühl, Sarah & Zühlsdorf, Anke & Spiller, Achim, 2014. "Consumer Attitudes in Germany towards Different Dairy Housing Systems and Their Implications for the Marketing of Pasture Raised Milk," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Richartz, P. Christoph & Abdulai, Awudu & Kornher, Lukas, 2020. "Attribute Non Attendance and Consumer Preferences for Online Food Products in Germany," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 69(1), March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:146101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.