IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gazdal/204891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Az ökológiai gazdaságok eredményei

Author

Listed:
  • Koltai, Judit Petra
  • Mazán, Márió

Abstract

Az ökológiai gazdálkodásokból származó megbízható és hasznos információk iránti igény növekedése várható, mert egyre több gazdaság tér át az ökológiai gazdálkodásra. Vizsgálataink szerint az ökológiai gazdálkodásban realizált hozamok jelentős ingadozást mutatnak a hagyományos gazdálkodási rendszerekhez képest, viszont magasabb értékesítési átlagárak realizálódnak. A fogyasztók hajlandóak akár 100-200%-os felárat is fizetni annak tudatában, hogy az általuk vásárolt termék „vegyszermentes” termelésből származik. Az ökológiai gazdaság költségszerkezete lényegesen különbözik a hagyományos gazdaságokétól, egyes költségek (pl. növényvédő szer) alacsonyabbak, míg mások (pl. bérköltség) magasabbak. A gyomszabályozás az ökológiai gazdálkodás egyik fő nehézsége, ráadásul a termelési költségek jelentős hányadát teszi ki. ------------------------ The demand for relevant and practical information about organic farming practices is likely to become greater as more growers enter the industry, presumably with little or no experience in commercial organic production. However, numerous reports state that institutional organic research and expansion is poorly developed, with relevant information being difficult to obtain. On the one hand, organic agricultural yields are likely to fall behind conventional ones. On the other, higher prices can be achieved as consumers’ needs tend to shift towards products of higher or special quality, and they are willing to pay up to 100-200% extra in order to purchase a product resulting from “non chemical” production. Its cost structure differs from conventional production as some cost forms are lower (e.g. pesticides), while others tend to be higher (e.g. salaries and employer’s contributions). Altogether, an 80-100% cost level can be seen as valid. Weed management is widely acknowledged as a major constraint in organic agriculture. The lack of relevant, accessible information, and concerns about the impact of weeds on production have highlighted the need for further research and an extension of OWM practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Koltai, Judit Petra & Mazán, Márió, 2007. "Az ökológiai gazdaságok eredményei," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 51(Special E), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gazdal:204891
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.204891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/204891/files/2007_20_Koltai_Mazan_64_74.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.204891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gazdal:204891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrfhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.