IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frrfes/290190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From how consumers categorize natural foodto their buying methods: a comparative study between France and Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Mathiot, Louis

Abstract

Based on a qualitative investigation comparing the ways in which Frenchand IsraeliBordinary^consumers view naturalness in food, this paper questions thechoices they make in terms of food supply and their relations to the food productionprocesses and the retail channels. The results of the study highlight that these repre-sentations, with the categorizations in which they are embodied, are strongly influencedby the context of life and the socio-cultural affiliations of these consumers. Thecomparison between the two countries allows to underline that the logics of categori-zation of the natural, and the related practices, are characterized by significant differ-ences due to food cultures and relations of trust or mistrust regarding the food chainsand industries. More broadly, the article demonstrates that investigating the conceptions that consumers have of naturalness is a relevant analyzer of their dietary decisions andtheir perceptions of food production and distribution systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathiot, Louis, 2017. "From how consumers categorize natural foodto their buying methods: a comparative study between France and Israel," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 99(1), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:290190
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.290190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290190/files/Mathiot2018_Article_FromHowConsumersCategorizeNatu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.290190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:290190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.