IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/355002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination des acteurs dans deux filières aoc Une approche par la théorie des coûts de transaction

Author

Listed:
  • Barjolle, Dominique
  • Chappuis, Jean-Marc

Abstract

Regional supply chains of quality products (PDO for example) build up their strategy on differentiation. The analysis by means of Transaction Cost Theory (Williamson, 1975, 1985) of two supply chains of Protected Designation of Origin allows us to identify the advantages and the disadvantages of organization forms for the transactions from milk producers to retailers. It was not possible to calculate the economies of costs linked to the observed governance mode. This is one of the classical criticisms of this approach. Nevertheless, the analysis remains interesting for us because it highlights the various mechanisms of the transactions at the different levels of the supply chain. We stress that the microeconomic character of the approach is a limit to the analysis. Mesoeconomic elements such as cultural bonds between the actors or macroecomomic elements such as market power of large retailers must be considered if we want to explain the encountered governance structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Barjolle, Dominique & Chappuis, Jean-Marc, 2000. "Coordination des acteurs dans deux filières aoc Une approche par la théorie des coûts de transaction," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:355002
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355002/files/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_258_1_5196.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:355002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.