IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/354737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion pratique et discussion strategique au nom de l'environnement. Differents modes de concertation pour definir des regles de gestion des marais

Author

Listed:
  • Candau, Jacqueline
  • Ruault, Claire

Abstract

Two dialogue plans, distinguished by their participants and the modal of discussion, were launched in 1990 in Charente Maritime about the marsh management. They have produced various results: le- gitimization of collaboration relations on one hand, formulation of a technical problematic on the other hand. These results are complementary to further define new action rules. But their difficult linking questions the conditions to consider the practitioner's knowledge, and the possibilities to fit the plans to the discussions progress. The evolving and pragmatic nature of the plans proved a condition to have a productive dialogue about ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Candau, Jacqueline & Ruault, Claire, 2002. "Discussion pratique et discussion strategique au nom de l'environnement. Differents modes de concertation pour definir des regles de gestion des marais," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 270.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354737
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/354737/files/ecoru_0013-0559_2002_num_270_1_5324.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.354737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.