Author
Abstract
The political economy of us agricultural policy - The United States engaged in an intensive agricultural policy debate in 1985 leading to passage of a new five-year farm bill, the Food Security Act of 1985. The political process sought to achieve several conflicting goals : (a) reductions in support levels to make the U.S. more competitive in world markets and stimulate exports which had fallen off sharply: (b) protection of farm income through government payments in the midst of declining land values and serious farm financial problems; and (c) reductions in the government cost of agricultural price and income support programs which had escalated sharply over the past five years. Since it was impossible to achieve all three of these goals because of inherent conflicts, the architects of farm policy opted to achieve the first two goals and sacrifice budget costs. The Congressional election in 1986 played a major role in shaping this outcome. However, another piece of legislation designed to balance the Federal budget by 1991 requires reductions in expenditures on agricultural and other programs. To the extent deficit reduction is achieved through expenditure cuts, the cost of agricultura price and income support programs will not be as high as initially expected under the new farm bill. The new farm policy has already been implemented for the 1 986 crop season and for dairy products. In the case of major price supported crops, market support (loan) levels have been reduced markedly; e. g. by 27 percent for wheat and 25 percent for corn. As in the past, U.S. agricultural policies will be subject to frequent change as the economic and political environment evolves. However, the basic thrust of the Food Security Act of 1985 is not likely to be altered in any fundamental way. Lower support levels will be maintained and substantial income protection to farmers will be provided through government payments. The cost of this policy to the government could be modified, however, through continuing efforts to deal with the larger budget deficit issue.
Suggested Citation
Eabel, M., 1986.
"Economie politique des programmes agricoles des Etats-Unis,"
Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 173.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ersfer:354198
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354198
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.