Author
Abstract
The attitudes of several British interest groups to the reform of the CAP are briefly described. These are partly as shown by their parliamentary submissions. British economists support a lowering of support prices and their better linkage with world prices to gain better the great advantages of free trade. This is in part the view of the government but it supports the set-aside of land, provided the burden is equally shared among member countries. Above all the government seeks to lower the exchequer cost of the CAP and to ensure that it does not disadvantage the UK. Thus like all the other groups it opposes modulation. Producers are now coming to accept that the CAP must change but deplore the continuing uncertainty about how it will do so. Their unions prefer supply control to the MacSharry proposals. Environmental groups in the main support neither a policy slanted toward family farms nor land withdrawal. Processing and marketing industries favour free trade but not very forcefully because some profit from the CAP. Upstream industries support the existing CAP more strongly especially insofar as it stimulates production and the intensive use of inputs. The interest groups are most united with respect to the MacSharry proposals in their opposition to modulation and the use of the CAP to maintain the existing agricultural population.
Suggested Citation
Sturgess, Ian, 1992.
"La réforme de la PAC : le débat britannique,"
Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 211.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ersfer:351781
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351781
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.