IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/351200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plans conjoints et gestion de l'offre, un essai d'évaluation de leurs impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Proulx, Yvon
  • Saint-Louis, Robert

Abstract

This article presents the main results of an analysis conducted to evaluate the impacts of Canadian agricultural marketing boards. Two types of marketing boards are considered. Those boards who do not control production seem to have an impact on prices at the farm level but not at the consumer level. The greater bargaining power given to producers is enabling them to capture a larger share of consumer food expenditures. Marketing boards who perform supply management functions exert more important upward pressures on prices at both levels. They also stabilize these prices. The problem of the monetary value taken by the production or marketing quotas under supply management is discussed and judged somewhat less important than other people have thought that they were so far.

Suggested Citation

  • Proulx, Yvon & Saint-Louis, Robert, 1979. "Plans conjoints et gestion de l'offre, un essai d'évaluation de leurs impacts," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 130.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351200
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/351200/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1979_num_130_1_2624.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.351200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.