Author
Listed:
- Labeyrie, Vincent
- Jarry, M.
Abstract
Ecology and economics, apart from their common root, seem to be fundamentally opposed. The ecological crisis is often presented as an inevitable consequence of all technological process. This rejection of the development of productive forces enables the fierceness of social struggles to be underestimated, the idea of austerity to be considered as unavoidable and science and scientists to be held responsible for this state of affairs. The development of mathematical models whose forecasts are catastrophic, guarantees objectivity. But all models are built on hypotheses that are coloured by the ideology of the individuals or groups that build them. The close analysis of two fundamental concepts used in these models — natural resources and consumption — shows that these concepts are not clear and that their use is strongly conditioned by the dominant ideology. The consideration of the use of natural resources shows that the present dominant strategies lead to possibilities being wasted, to waste products, — apparently resources that have been thrown away, — being accumulated, and to possible technological choices being limited. All this goes against the widening of knowledge and of technological possibilities which enable solutions to be increasingly suited to the heterogenous possibilities of nature. The control of productive forces would not be enough if it were not accompanied by a revision of intervention strategies inherited from a pre -ecological era. It is in this sense that ecology acquires its true dimension in the economic field.
Suggested Citation
Labeyrie, Vincent & Jarry, M., 1978.
"A propos des relations écologie et société,"
Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 124.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ersfer:351126
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351126
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.