Author
Abstract
The preponderance of yam in the subsistence production of present-day Baoulé and the valorization of this crop within the representation system of the peasants characterize the agriculture of this region of the Ivory Coast. These aspects determine the image of the precolonial agriculture held by «development» executives as well as «social scientists». The object of this article is to show why this image doesn't correspond to historical realities. The reconstitution from oral traditions and early colonial archives shows a very diversified agriculture which can only be understood in the context of a complex valorization system of all productions where the agricultural element is only a part (gold production and handicraft, especially of cotton ; national and intercontinental trade). Colonization upset old conditions of valorization and introduced foreign constraints thus inducing a regression of the productive assets and inside the purely agricultural sphere discouraged the crops which were the most subject to direct intervention (rice, corn, cotton). Yam had the advantage of a more liberal policy because it didn't fit in with the colonial «model» of a strategic products. The distorsion of precolonial realities into a stereotyped «precolonial referent» can be explained by a need for justification on the part of the colonizers. At the same time, the Baoulé producers modified their own representations to the advantage of the already culturally valorized yam. Consequently, most so-called «socio- cultural obstacles» date back to 1 900-1*91 8 for the crops most touched by the central government action when a plantation economy was outlined (ground-nuts) which developped outside the rules laid down by the colonizers. Contemporary researchers generally working oh an «ethnographical present» had little chance to escape this caricatured image of precolonial Baoulé agriculture.
Suggested Citation
Chauveau, Jean-Pierre, 1982.
"L'image de l'agriculture baule (Côte-d'Ivoire) et les développeurs : «réfèrent» précolonial et réalités historiques,"
Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 147.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ersfer:349915
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.349915
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:349915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.