IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/335316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tensions internes et ruptures politiques : où en est le processus d’institutionnalisation de l’agroécologie au Brésil ?

Author

Listed:
  • Guéneau, Stéphane
  • Sabourin, Éric
  • Niederle, Paulo André
  • Schmitt, Claudia Job

Abstract

This article analyzes the trajectory of agroecology policies in Brazil. The methodology includes an extended literature review and interviews with key actors based on a framework that drew from that of the sociology of public action. The results indicate that the formation of a coalition of social movements has played a major role in the adoption of the national policy for agroecology and organic production. The design and implementation of this policy are based on a series of participatory and intersectoral mechanisms. However, the coalition is faced with internal tensions about the agroecological project. The political change that took place in 2016 has blocked this process, but other dynamics can be anticipated, in particular at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Guéneau, Stéphane & Sabourin, Éric & Niederle, Paulo André & Schmitt, Claudia Job, 2020. "Tensions internes et ruptures politiques : où en est le processus d’institutionnalisation de l’agroécologie au Brésil ?," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 372(April-Jun).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:335316
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.335316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335316/files/economierurale-7768.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.335316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:335316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.