IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eeaeje/343262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-temporal Economic Sustainability Convergence in Koga Irrigation and Watershed Project, Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Belay, Abebe
  • Simane, Belay
  • Teferi, Ermias

Abstract

The spatio-temporal economic sustainability convergence of twelve irrigation blocks in the Koga irrigation and watershed project was tested in this study. Data on technical efficiency were used to examine the expected growth and speed of convergence in order to reach the production frontier and achieve similar economic sustainability. The study used inefficiency parameterizations, convergence theory, and scenario development as a methodology on a survey questionnaire that includes household demography, operational, and farm-specific data in a trans-log stochastic frontier model. The efficiency parameterization was used to identify the level of economic sustainability, and the convergence theory and scenario development were used to calculate the expected growth rate of efficiency and the speed of convergence in years. The main findings are that a household at the project level requires 9.42 percent growth to achieve optimum efficiency over ten years, and a farmer requires 15.46 years if the minimum reasonable growth rate of 6 percent per year is assumed. The findings that policymakers appear to be increasingly emphasizing efforts to improve the efficiency of less efficient farmers rather than investing in new technologies and inputs to ensure higher levels of economic sustainability highlight the critical role of efficiency improvement. Over a five-year period, the economic sustainability catch-up effect requires a growth differential of 2.11 - 9.45 percent. Household size, frequency of consultation visits, male household heads, the sharecroppers' mentality, and non-farm income are thought to facilitate convergence at the frontier while fostering experience sharing towards a similar level of sustainability. On various grounds, the expected growth rate and speed of convergence were discovered to be reasonable targets in the study area. The calculated expected growth rate was very close to what other studies confirmed. As a result of the findings, local governments should consider convergence at the frontier as a long-term plan and catch up for short-term goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Belay, Abebe & Simane, Belay & Teferi, Ermias, 2022. "Spatio-temporal Economic Sustainability Convergence in Koga Irrigation and Watershed Project, Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 31(02), October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343262
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343262/files/Spatio-temporal%20Economic%20Sustainability%20Convergence.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vernon W. Ruttan, 2002. "Productivity Growth in World Agriculture: Sources and Constraints," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 161-184, Fall.
    2. Kneller, Richard & Andrew Stevens, Philip, 2003. "The specification of the aggregate production function in the presence of inefficiency," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 223-226, November.
    3. Rudi Purwono (a) and Mohammad Zeqi Yasin (b), 2020. "Does Efficiency Convergence of Economy Promote Total Factor Productivity? A Case of Indonesia," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 69-91, December.
    4. Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Wang, Hung-Jen, 2005. "Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 300-305, September.
    5. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    6. Markose Chekol Zewdie & Michele Moretti & Daregot Berihun Tenessa & Zemen Ayalew Ayele & Jan Nyssen & Enyew Adgo Tsegaye & Amare Sewnet Minale & Steven Van Passel, 2021. "Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Lingran Yuan & Shurui Zhang & Shuo Wang & Zesen Qian & Binlei Gong, 2021. "World agricultural convergence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 135-153, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabrina Auci & Laura Castellucci & Manuela Coromaldi, 2021. "How does public spending affect technical efficiency? Some evidence from 15 European countries," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 108-130, January.
    2. Michelle Baddeley, 2006. "Convergence or Divergence? The Impacts of Globalisation on Growth and Inequality in Less Developed Countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 391-410.
    3. Rudi Purwono (a) and Mohammad Zeqi Yasin (b), 2020. "Does Efficiency Convergence of Economy Promote Total Factor Productivity? A Case of Indonesia," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 69-91, December.
    4. Rudi Purwono & Mohammad Zeqi Yasin, 2018. "The Convergence Test Of Indonesia Banking Inefficiency: Do Macroeconomic Indicators Matter?," Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, vol. 21(1), pages 123-138, July.
    5. Danquah, Michael, 2018. "Technology transfer, adoption of technology and the efficiency of nations: Empirical evidence from sub Saharan Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 175-182.
    6. Ceyhun Elgin & Selman Çakır, 2015. "Technological progress and scientific indicators: a panel data analysis," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 263-281, April.
    7. M. Danquah & B. Ouattara, 2014. "Productivity Growth, Human Capital And Distance To Frontier In Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 27-48, December.
    8. Barnabé Walheer, 2016. "Multi-Sector Nonparametric Production-Frontier Analysis of the Economic Growth and the Convergence of the European Countries," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 498-524, October.
    9. Garcia, Fernando & César de Souza, Rogério & Pires, Jorge Oliveira, 2008. "Technical change: It should be positive and make sense!," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 388-391, September.
    10. Giampaolo Garzarelli & Stephen M. Miller & Yasmina R. Limam, 2016. "Output Decomposition in the Presence of Input Quality Effects: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Working Papers 613, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    11. Gloria O. Dzeha & Joshua Abor & Festus Turkson & Elikplimi Agbloyor, 2018. "Technical Efficiency and Technical Change in Africa: The Role of Money from the Diasporas," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 177-177, July.
    12. Lingran Yuan & Shurui Zhang & Shuo Wang & Zesen Qian & Binlei Gong, 2021. "World agricultural convergence," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 135-153, April.
    13. Federico Inchausti-Sintes & Ubay Pérez-Granja & José Juan Morales-Mohamed, 2021. "Analysing labour productivity and its economic consequences in the two Spanish tourist archipelagos," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1039-1059, August.
    14. Michael Danquah & Bazoumana Ouattara & Peter Quartey, 2018. "Technology Transfer and National Efficiency: Does Absorptive Capacity Matter?," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 162-174, June.
    15. Binlei Gong, 2020. "New Growth Accounting," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 641-661, March.
    16. Glass, Anthony J. & Kenjegalieva, Karligash & Sickles, Robin C., 2016. "A spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier model for panel data with asymmetric efficiency spillovers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 289-300.
    17. Juan Carlos Chávez-Martín del Campo & Felipe de Jesús Fonseca-Hernández, 2013. "Technical Efficiency, Technological Development, And The Labor Productivity Gap In Mexican Manufacturing," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 13(2), pages 43-58.
    18. Gregory Brock & Constantin Ogloblin, 2014. "Another look at technical efficiency in American states, 1979–2000," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 577-590, September.
    19. Gregory Brock & Constantin Ogloblin, 2018. "Russian 1998–2007 TFP decomposed: some inspiration emerging from inherited Soviet legacy," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 135-151, May.
    20. Dimitris K Christopoulos & Gregorios Siourounis & Irene Vlachaki, 2016. "Democratic Reforms, Foreign Aid and Production Inefficiency," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 84(3), pages 363-389, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:343262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa2ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.