IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/23896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr, William A.

Abstract

Much has been made of "special and differential" treatment in the Doha Development Round of WTO negotiations. In particular, a conscious effort has been made to infer that special and differential treatment will promote development. While special and differential treatment may be a necessary evil given developing countries' higher adjustment costs, dignifying it as a development mechanism plays into the hands of protectionist interests. In particular, by allowing a general increase in the ability of developing countries to isolate their economies, it may reduce the efficacy of important forces that prod institutional reforms in developing countries. As institutional reform is one of the keys to economic development, lionizing special and differential treatment in the WTO is likely to be counterproductive.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr, William A., 2005. "Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:23896
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23896/files/06020084.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerr, William A., 2001. "Dumping - One of Those Economic Myths," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10.
    2. Guyomard, Herve & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2003. "The New Banana Import Regime in the European Union: A Quantitative Assessment," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19.
    3. Jennifer I. Considine & William A. Kerr, 2002. "The Russian Oil Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2491.
    4. Read, Robert, 2001. "The Anatomy of the EU-US WTO Banana Trade Dispute," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 2(2), pages 1-26.
    5. James D. Gaisford & William A. Kerr & Nicholas Perdikis, 2003. "Economic Analysis for EU Accession Negotiations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3119.
    6. Kerr, William A., 2005. "Vested Interests in Queuing and the Loss of the WTO's Club Good: The Long-run Costs of US Bilateralism," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerr, William A., 2021. "Generalized System of Preferences and Graduation: Is there a Parallel with Infant Industries?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 22(2), December.
    2. Omphemetse S. Sibanda Sr., 2015. "Towards a Revised GATT/WTO Special and Differential Treatment Regime for Least Developed and Developing Countries," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 50(1), pages 31-40, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangeeta Khorana & Nicholas Perdikis & May T. Yeung & William A. Kerr, 2010. "Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Era of Globalization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13719.
    2. Kerr, William A., 2005. "Vested Interests in Queuing and the Loss of the WTO's Club Good: The Long-run Costs of US Bilateralism," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10.
    3. Kerr, William A., 2013. "Negotiating in Disequilibrium: Can a Trans-Pacific Partnership be Achieved as Potential Partners Proliferate?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12.
    4. Anania, Giovanni, 2010. "EU Economic Partnership Agreements and WTO negotiations. A quantitative assessment of trade preference granting and erosion in the banana market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 140-153, April.
    5. Guyomard, Herve & Le Mouel, Chantal & Levert, Fabrice, 2006. "The Tariff-only Import Regime for Bananas in the European Union: Setting the Tariff at Right Level is Impossible Mission," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25773, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Kerr, William A., 2018. "Dismantling Trade Agreements: Why Is It So Difficult?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 19(1), June.
    7. Valenciano, Jaime de Pablo & Battistuzzi, Miguel Angel Giacinti & Azcaráte, Tomás García, 2015. ""Banana War" And World Trade Changes," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 3(2), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Herve Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël & Fabrice Levert & . International Association of Agricultural Economists, 2006. "The tariff-only regime for bananas in the European Union: Settingthe tariff at right level is impossible mission," Post-Print hal-01594038, HAL.
    9. repec:got:cegedp:30 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Mihaela NECULITA, 2018. "Trends of the Russian Economy in the World Economy," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 104-109.
    11. Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Nowak-Lehmann D., Felicitas, 2004. "MERCOSUR-European Union Trade: How important is EU Trade Liberalisation for MERCOSUR's Exports?," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 30, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    12. Hervé Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël & Fabrice Levert & J. Lambana, 2005. "The tariff-only import regime for bananas in the European Union: Is setting the tariff at right level an impossible mission?," Post-Print halshs-00083696, HAL.
    13. Fritz Breuss, 2004. "WTO Dispute Settlement: An Economic Analysis of Four EU–US Mini Trade Wars—A Survey," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 275-315, December.
    14. Bakhshi, Samira & Kerr, William A., 2010. "Labour Standards as a Justification for Trade Barriers: Consumer Concerns, Protectionism and the Evidence," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, May.
    15. William A. Kerr, 2010. "Conflict, Chaos and Confusion," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14147.
    16. Hervé Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 2003. "Tensions around a trade regime : the GATT/WTO banana story," Post-Print hal-01594084, HAL.
    17. Goodloe, Carol, 2004. "Trading Remedies To Remedy Trade: The Nafta Experience; Discussion," Proceedings of the 8th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2002: Keeping the Borders Open 16927, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    18. Gorbacheva, Natalya V. & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2015. "Pain without gain? Reviewing the risks and rewards of investing in Russian coal-fired electricity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 970-986.
    19. Jae-Seung Lee, 2006. "Beyond New Markets: BRICs and Korean Diplomacy1," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 9(2), pages 0-18, June.
    20. Anania, Giovanni, 2006. "The 2005 episodes of the "banana war" serial. An empirical assessment of the introduction by the European Union of a tariff-only import regime for bananas," Working Papers 18854, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    21. David Vanzetti & Santiago Fernandez de Córdoba & Veronica Chau, 2005. "Banana Split: How Eu Policies Divide Global Producers," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 31, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:23896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.