Author
Listed:
- Schnettler, Berta
- Fica, Deisi
- Sepulveda, Jose
- Sepulveda, Nestor
- Denegri, Marianela
Abstract
Considering the relative changes in the consumption of white and red meats, the aim of this study is to distinguish different consumer segments in Temuco (Region of the Araucanía, Chile) on the basis of knowledge of the nutritional aspects related to the consumption of the main types of meats available in the country. Data is collected through a survey of 400 people. Using seven affi rmations on subjects that interviewees had to catalog as true or false, a score of 53.2% common knowledge was obtained, with greater awareness of the risks of red meat consumption than its benefi ts. Using hierarchical clustering, four segments were distinguished with no differences in the frequency of beef, pork or chicken consumption. The largest group (45.7%) presented a common knowledge score similar to the total sample. The second group (27.0%) with a score of 71.83% had the highest proportion of people from the higher socioeconomic strata and tertiary-level education. The third segment (14.8%) with a score of 39.84% had the highest proportion of consumers who received only elementary education. The smallest segment (12.5%) with a score of 26.68% contained few consumers with university studies and the greatest proportion belonging to the lower-middle and low socioeconomic strata and the Mapuche ethnic group. Nutritional knowledge with respect to different types of meat is related to educational level and, secondarily, to the consumer’s socioeconomic and ethnic group; however, it has not yet affected the frequency of consumption of different types of meat.
Suggested Citation
Schnettler, Berta & Fica, Deisi & Sepulveda, Jose & Sepulveda, Nestor & Denegri, Marianela, 2009.
"Conocimiento sobre riesgos y benefi cios del consumo de distintos tipos de carne en la Región de La Araucanía, Chile,"
Economia Agraria (Revista Economia Agraria), Agrarian Economist Association (AEA), Chile, vol. 13, pages 1-14.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:eaaeac:97378
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.97378
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaaeac:97378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaagea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.