IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/bdbjaf/200180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship Between Coale'S Method And Reverse Survival Method-A Critical Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed, Faroque

Abstract

The relationship between Coale's method and Reverse Survival method has been investigated in this article. Since Coale's method produces estimates which are found to be approximately equal to that of reverse survival method, it is useful to determine a constant multiplier to make Coale's estimates equal to that of the reverse survival method. In this effort, the west model life tables have been used and the constant multipliers for males and females have been found. The male's and female's multipliers are 1.0054 and 1.0083 respectively. It is interesting to note that when the estimates based on Coale's method are known, the estimates based on the reverse survival method can be obtained for both the sexes by using the common multiplier 1.01.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed, Faroque, 2008. "Relationship Between Coale'S Method And Reverse Survival Method-A Critical Comparison," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 1-08, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200180
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200180/files/Resear_01%20Vol-XXXI.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/febaubd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.