IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/96068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit Evaluation on Land Comprehensive Consolidation in the Small Towns —A Case of Daxing District, Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Cui-hong
  • Li, Hong
  • Jia, Jin-song

Abstract

Taking Daxing District, Beijing, China as a example, benefit evaluation index system of small-town land comprehensive consolidation is established from four aspects of resource benefit, economic benefit, social benefit and ecological benefit. Weight of evaluation index is determined by analytic hierarchy process. After the standardized treatment on the original value index, comprehensive index method is adopted to evaluate the land comprehensive consolidation benefits in 14 towns of Daxing District in the year 2005, combining with the index weight determined by analytic hierarchy process. Evaluation result shows that areas having significant effects are Yizhuang Town, Xihongmen Town, Yinghai Town, and Jiugong Town, which are concentrated in rural-urban continuum with significant location advantages and good economic and infrastructure status. Areas having good effects are Changziying Town, Huangcun Town, Panggezhuang Town, Beizangcun Town, and Yufa Town, which are located along Yongding River, with abundant farmland resources and good ecological environment. Areas having general effects are Weishan Town, Qingyundian Town, and Anding Town, with insignificant location advantages. Areas with no significant effects are Lixian Town and Caiyu Town, with relatively poor location, resource, and economic development status.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Cui-hong & Li, Hong & Jia, Jin-song, 2010. "Benefit Evaluation on Land Comprehensive Consolidation in the Small Towns —A Case of Daxing District, Beijing, China," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 2(07), pages 1-3, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:96068
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.96068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/96068/files/____l.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.96068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:96068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.