Author
Listed:
- Wei, Hong-ying
- Wang, Lan-ying
- Qiu, Yu-qiao
Abstract
Financial cost benefit (investment yield, financial net present value, benefit-cost ratio), social and economic benefits (saving rate of medical cost, average household income rate of trained farmers), technical and economic benefits (toilet-flushing water saves, pests and disease reduce rate, fruit or vegetable increase rate, and improve rate of technical skill level), and ecological and economic benefits (saving rate of afforestation cost, reduction of CO2 discharge, reduction of SO2 discharge, soil improvement, fertilizer saving rate) are selected. According to the original survey data of eco-campus economic benefits with 3 different models, Principal Component Projection is used to discuss the calculation method for evaluation index weight of economic benefits in northwest rural eco-campus, and to establish the principal component projection model of eco-campus economic benefits after the normalization processing of index value by efficiency coefficient transformation method based on dimensionless treatment of matrix element. Result shows that from the aspect of financial cost, economic benefits of three eco-campus modes are insignificant. Both ecological benefits and economic benefits are achieved at the same time. According to the overall evaluation results of Principal Component Projection Model, the “Pig, Toilet-Biogas-Vegetable” mode has obtained the maximum economic benefits, followed by the “Grass–Sheep, Toilet-Biogas-Fruit”. And the “Toilet-Biogas-Vegetable” has the poorest economic benefits. This result is of strong practical significance and provides a theoretical basis for economic evaluation research and extension of eco-campus construction in rural primary and secondary schools in other areas of China.
Suggested Citation
Wei, Hong-ying & Wang, Lan-ying & Qiu, Yu-qiao, 2009.
"Economic Benefit Evaluation and Application of Northwest Rural Eco-Campus Based on Principal Component Projection Model,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 1(11-12), pages 1-4, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:93460
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.93460
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:93460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.