IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/53436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences of county economic development in Hebei Province based on realistic competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Su-qing

Abstract

Unbalanced economic development among counties exists objectively and is a fact generally accepted. Realistic competitiveness evaluation is used to discover the differences among county economic development levels in Hebei Province in order to find out the status of county economic development, to promote the harmonious development among counties, and to offer references for the policy making of macro-economy development by the government. Researchers show that there are great differences among county economics of Hebei Province. Difference between the most rich and poor counties is 20.736 according to the total competitiveness score by index calculation of realistic competitiveness. Development levels of the counties in Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Langfang and Qinhuangdao are relatively high, while those in Xingtai mountainous area and regions around Beijing and Tianjin are relatively backward according to regional distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Su-qing, 2009. "Differences of county economic development in Hebei Province based on realistic competitiveness," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 1(01), pages 1-5, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:53436
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.53436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/53436/files/Differences%20of%20county%20economic%20development%20in%20Hebei%20Province%20based%20on%20realistic%20competitiveness.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.53436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:53436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.