Author
Listed:
- Yao, Ze
- Jiang, Shengxiu
- Yan, Zizhu
- Wang, Qi
- Wang, Dawei
Abstract
This paper delves into and assesses the differences in biological traits and fruit nutritional composition of 3 varieties of Prunus humilis introduced from 2 different regions. Results showed that (i) the contents of protein, total sugar, and calcium of No.5 variety were higher those of the other 2 varieties, which was recognized as the most suitable variety for fresh fruit; (ii) the comparison of leaf areas index and fruit shape index of 3 varieties shows that the fruit shape index and individual fruit weight of the introduced varieties were higher than those of the control, the diameter of individual fruit of the introduced varieties higher than that of the control indicated that they had a higher fruit hardness, more dry matter accumulation and better fruit quality, and that the introduction region was more suitable for scale-up of P. humilis; (iii) there was a positive correlation with the number of fruiting branches and there was a significant negative correlation with individual fruit weight, while the leaf area had a significant negative correlation with the number of fruiting branches. The introduced varieties can develop normally in the 2 testing areas, notably, No.5 variety performed better than No.4 and No.6. Improving management is the prerequisite for maintaining proper number of fruiting branches and high yield.
Suggested Citation
Yao, Ze & Jiang, Shengxiu & Yan, Zizhu & Wang, Qi & Wang, Dawei, .
"Selection of Suitable Area and Analysis of Adaptability Difference of Prunus humilis,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 16(03).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:349066
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.349066
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:349066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.