Author
Listed:
- ZHANG,Jie
- ZHANG,Gang
- SHEN,Zhanbin
- DUAN,Lumei
- ZHANG,Wei
- LUO,Junxia
- ZHAO,Jianbo
Abstract
[Objectives] The paper was to understand the detection effect of commercial enzyme inhibition colorimetric kit. [Methods] Six brands of kits were used to detect pesticide residues in vegetables. The detection results were compared with those of 50 kinds of organophosphorus pesticides and 10 kinds of carbamate pesticides detected by chromatography and mass spectrometry. According to different thresholds, the test results of different kits were evaluated, and the false positive rate, false negative rate and coincidence rate of each kit were obtained. The test results of commercial enzyme inhibition colorimetric kits were compared and analyzed. [Results] The detection effect of kit D was the best among the 6 brands of kits, and the coincidence rate was the highest under the 7 thresholds. There was a certain relationship between the detection effect of commercial enzyme inhibition colorimetric kit and the determination threshold of positive samples. The false positive rate decreased with the increase of determination threshold, and the false negative rate increased with the increase of determination threshold, but the coincidence rate with chromatography and mass spectrometry can not reach 100%. When the threshold was set to 20%, the effect was the best. The coincidence rate of 3 brands of kits with the results of chromatography and mass spectrometry was the highest, and none of the 6 kits involved in the comparison had the lowest coincidence rate under this threshold. [Conclusions] It is suggested to modify the threshold values in national standard and trade standard.
Suggested Citation
ZHANG,Jie & ZHANG,Gang & SHEN,Zhanbin & DUAN,Lumei & ZHANG,Wei & LUO,Junxia & ZHAO,Jianbo, 2022.
"Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Vegetables by Enzyme Inhibition Colorimetric Kit,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 14(08), August.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:338229
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.338229
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:338229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.