Author
Listed:
- YUAN, Chenguang
- WANG, Lingchao
- SONG, Yanhua
- WANG, Ziwei
- TIAN, Yan
Abstract
In order to protect the property rights and interests of farmers, promote the revitalization and development of rural areas, and provide a reference basis for the reform of marketing rural collective land for development purposes, this study explores the reasonable distribution proportion of land increment income from marketing rural collective land for development purposes through analytic hierarchy process and Delphi expert scoring method. The results show that there is a positive correlation between land increment income and land grade, that is, the higher the land grade, the higher the increment income, the larger the proportion of increment income to the transaction price. According to the calculation, when marketing rural collective land for development purposes, the reasonable distribution proportion of the land increment income of the government and the village collective is 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively, and the land increment income actually obtained by farmers has been greatly improved compared with the current situation. In practice, this distribution model has universal applicability and long-term mechanism. The reform of marketing also needs to improve the standard of marketing, explore diversified channels to protect interests, and strengthen the construction of rural collective management system. In short, the distribution of land increment income from marketing rural collective land for development purposes should proceed from the perspective of land property rights and the factors affecting the price of collective land for development purposes, in order to build a reasonable income distribution model.
Suggested Citation
YUAN, Chenguang & WANG, Lingchao & SONG, Yanhua & WANG, Ziwei & TIAN, Yan, 2021.
"Distribution of Land Increment Income from Marketing Rural Collective Land for Development Purposes:A Case Study of Changyuan City,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 13(10), October.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:317709
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317709
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:317709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.