Author
Listed:
- BAI, Yanrong
- JIANG, Yalian
Abstract
Lucetta, a cultivar of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners, was subjected to treatments of different light intensities (100%, 85%, 70% and 55% of natural light intensity) and different light durations (10-h natural lighting, 12-h natural lighting, 12-h natural lighting + 2-h LED lighting, 12-h natural lighting + 4-h LED lighting), and then its plant height, crown width, stem thickness, stalk thickness, total flower number, flowering period and growth situation were analyzed. The results show that E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners is sensitive to the changes in light intensity. Under 85% of natural light intensity (40 000-50 000 lux), E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners grew faster, bloomed earlier with more flowers, and was taller, thicker, more robust, higher in yield, larger in pedicel length, and better in cut flower quality, without rosette phenomenon. Long-term exposure to low-intensity light would led to slow growth, thin stalk, delayed flowering, low yield and reduced cut flower quality in E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners. The illumination duration of more than 12 h could promote the differentiation of flower buds, increase the plant height, increase the length of pedicels of E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners. Extending the light duration by 2-4 h at night, that is, 14-16-h of illumination was the most ideal illumination time for the growth of E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners. A longer photoperiod could promote the growth and bring forward the blooming of E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners. The longer the illumination time, the higher the plant. The optimum illumination time was between 14 and 16 h. When the illumination duration was shorter than 12 h, the growth of E. grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners was retarded, and its flowering was also delayed.
Suggested Citation
BAI, Yanrong & JIANG, Yalian, 2019.
"Effects of Illumination on Growth and Development and Quality of Cut Flowers of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 11(12), December.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:300982
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.300982
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:300982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.