IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/292421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fragmented Learning and Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • ZHU,Jie
  • CHEN,Ping
  • JIA,Wenjun

Abstract

The development of information technology has changed people's learning methods. Fragmented learning, as an informal learning method, has become an important way to accept new knowledge and learn new technologies. Through analyzing the connotation, characteristics, and advantages and disadvantages of fragmented learning, this paper came up with reasonable recommendations for fragmented learning. To truly become systematic and holistic knowledge, fragmented knowledge must be explored, understood, integrated and internalized. This paper is expected to play an important guiding role in building a lifelong learning society.

Suggested Citation

  • ZHU,Jie & CHEN,Ping & JIA,Wenjun, 2019. "Advantages and Disadvantages of Fragmented Learning and Recommendations," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 11(04), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:292421
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.292421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292421/files/Advantages%20and%20Disadvantages%20of%20Fragmented%20Learning%20and%20Recommendations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.292421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maoyan She & Yuhan Tan & Zhigang Li, 2024. "Antecedents of College Students’ Continuance Behaviors in Online Fragmented Learning: An Empirical Analysis from the Extended ECM Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:292421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.