Author
Listed:
- ZHAO, Yangyi
- DUAN, Xu
- SHU, Shumiao
Abstract
In order to clarify the influence of different forest types on soil erosion resistance in water source area of Central Yunnan, with the soils under three different kinds of typical forest in Yizhe watershed as the research object, this paper uses field simulation method and principal component analysis to analyze the soil erosion resistance of three kinds of soils. The results show that there is a significant difference in the shear strength of soil among three types of typical forest, and the size of soil shear strength is in the order of Pinus yunnanensis forest land>mixed broadleaf-conifer forest land>eucalyptus forest land. The difference in the soil erosion coefficient among different forests is not significant, and the soil erosion resistance is highest in mixed broadleaf-conifer forest land (39.0%), followed by eucalyptus woodland (37.0%) and Pinus yunnanensis forest land (24.0%). Under heavy rain intensity and long duration of rainfall, the ability of soil under Eucalyptus ×Pinus yunnanensis mixed forests to resist disintegration is more obvious. Using principal component analysis to analyze soil erosion resistance of soils under three different forests, we get the comprehensive evaluation model for soil erosion resistance: Y=0.763Y1+0.236Y2. The soil erosion resistance is in the order of mixed broadleaf-conifer forest land (0.150)> eucalyptus forest land (0.127)> Pinus yunnanensis forest land (-0.079), indicating that the mixed forests have better water loss and soil erosion control effect than pure forests.
Suggested Citation
ZHAO, Yangyi & DUAN, Xu & SHU, Shumiao, 2015.
"The Influence of Typical Forest Types on Soil Erosion Resistance in the Water Source Areas of Central Yunnan,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(07), pages 1-6, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:209845
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.209845
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:209845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.