Author
Abstract
Through the initial selection, screening and simplification, a set of performance appraisal system of logistic distribution suited to fresh agricultural products is established. In the process of establishing the appraisal indicator, the representative appraisal indicator of logistic distribution of fresh agricultural products is further obtained by delivering experts’ survey and applying the ABC screening system. The distribution costs, transportation and service level belong to the first level indicator; packing fees, distribution processing fees, full-load ratio, haulage capacity, customer satisfaction and the strain capability of delivery personnel belong to second level indicator. At the same time, the weighing of each indicator is determined. The quantification is conducted on indicators. The qualitative indicators applies ten-point system and then coverts these indicators into percentage, that is the number between [0,1];as for the quantitative indicators, they are concluded to the interval [0,1] according to the actual value range of the indicators and by applying the grade of membership in the vague mathematics. Through the analyses of the advantages and disadvantages of the frequently used performance evaluation method and its applicable conditions, the comprehensive evaluation of logistic distribution of agricultural products obtained by using the method of fuzzy comprehensive appraisal. The results show that, in terms of reducing distribution costs, the packaging and distribution processing technology of fresh agricultural products should be improved, so as to reduce distribution costs. In the process of introducing the application of advanced technology, the high automatic logistic equipments should be introduced.
Suggested Citation
Yu, Hang & Zhang, Kai, 2010.
"Performance Appraisal Method of Logistic Distribution for Fresh Agricultural Products,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 2(11), pages 1-3, November.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:asagre:102365
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.102365
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:102365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.