IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/348993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Juxtaposing Gender Differentials in Credit Assessment of Farmers in Nigeria: A Hybridized Credit-Scoring Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ukoha, Igwe Ikenna
  • Osuji, Maryann
  • Uhuegbulem, Ifyenwa Josephine
  • Ibekwe, Chigozie
  • Ibeagwa, Okwudili

Abstract

Using data from 360 smallholder farmers in Southeast Nigeria, the study creates the architecture for a new farmer's hybrid credit rating system used in classifying farmers who applied for microfinance loans based on their creditworthiness. We discovered new evidence that the hybridized credit scoring algorithm demonstrated unprecedented concordance in assessing the financial viability of farmers along gender lines. The discriminant analysis, in particular, closely aligned with the credit score model, with 34.4% and 46.7% of male and female farmers grouped as creditworthy, reflecting the model's estimates of 33.3% and 45.5%, indicating gaps of 12.3% and 12.2%, respectively, to the advantage of the female farmers. Our findings further suggest that annual income, marital status, and farm size strongly influence the separation between creditworthy and non-creditworthy farmers. While age, loan term, and a history of defaults had a negative impact on discrimination, in light of the findings, we recommend a collaboration between authorities, financial institutions, and extension workers in offering tailored trainings to both male and female farmers, assisting them in meeting up-to-date credit prerequisites, adopting modified farming techniques, and improving their general preparedness to be accepted for loans in this changing credit evaluation landscape so as to bridge the disparity and promote financial inclusion for farmers irrespective of gender affiliations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ukoha, Igwe Ikenna & Osuji, Maryann & Uhuegbulem, Ifyenwa Josephine & Ibekwe, Chigozie & Ibeagwa, Okwudili, 2024. "Juxtaposing Gender Differentials in Credit Assessment of Farmers in Nigeria: A Hybridized Credit-Scoring Approach," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 16(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:348993
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348993/files/631_agris-on-line-3-2024-ukoha-osuji-uhuegbulem-ibekwe-ibeagwa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Andrés, Pablo & Gimeno, Ricardo & Mateos de Cabo, Ruth, 2021. "The gender gap in bank credit access," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Chen, Xiao & Huang, Bihong & Ye, Dezhu, 2020. "Gender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Ukoha, Igwe. Ikenna & Mejeha, Remy & Nwaru, Jude & Ibeagwa, Okwudili & Maduike, Iifeanyi, 2020. "Explicating the Prevalence of Women Farmers’ Deterrence from Microfinance Banks Loans in South-East Nigeria: A Censored Tobit Regression Model of Analysis," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 7(2), pages 82-89.
    4. Bai, Chunguang & Shi, Baofeng & Liu, Feng & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Banking credit worthiness: Evaluating the complex relationships," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-38.
    5. Oluyemi Theophilus Adeosun & Kayode Ebenezer Owolabi, 2021. "Gender inequality: determinants and outcomes in Nigeria," Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 165-181, July.
    6. C. Chris Ofonyelu & R. Santos Alimi, 2013. "Perceived Loan Risk and Ex Post Default Outcome: Are The Banks’ Loan Screening Criteria Efficient?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(8), pages 991-1002.
    7. Ukoha, Igwe. Ikenna & Mejeha, Remy & Nwaru, Jude & Ibeagwa, Okwudili & Maduike, Iifeanyi, 2020. "Explicating the Prevalence of Women Farmers’ Deterrence from Microfinance Banks Loans in South-East Nigeria: A Censored Tobit Regression Model of Analysis," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 7(2), pages 82-89.
    8. Catherine C. Eckel & Sascha C. Füllbrunn, 2015. "Thar SHE Blows? Gender, Competition, and Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 906-920, February.
    9. C. Chris Ofonyelu & R. Santos Alimi, 2013. "Perceived Loan Risk and Ex Post Default Outcome: Are The Banks’ Loan Screening Criteria Efficient?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(8), pages 991-1002, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reynal-Querol, Marta & García-Montalvo, José, 2020. "Gender And Credit Risk: A View From The Loan Officer'S Desk," CEPR Discussion Papers 14500, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Jetter, Michael & Walker, Jay K., 2015. "Game, set, and match: Do women and men perform differently in competitive situations?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 96-108.
    3. Agarwal, Shivam & Muckley, Cal B. & Neelakantan, Parvati, 2023. "Countering racial discrimination in algorithmic lending: A case for model-agnostic interpretation methods," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Liu, Yi & Yang, Menglong & Wang, Yudong & Li, Yongshan & Xiong, Tiancheng & Li, Anzhe, 2022. "Applying machine learning algorithms to predict default probability in the online credit market: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Eva Ranehill & Roberto A. Weber, 2022. "Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 845-875, June.
    6. Corgnet, Brice & Hernán-González, Roberto & Kujal, Praveen, 2020. "On booms that never bust: Ambiguity in experimental asset markets with bubbles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Stéphane Robin & Kateřina Strážnická & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Bubbles and incentives: an experiment on asset markets," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 68-89, January.
    8. Stefan Palan & Jürgen Huber & Larissa Senninger, 2020. "Aggregation mechanisms for crowd predictions," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(3), pages 788-814, September.
    9. José Garcia Montalvo & Marta Reynal-Querol, 2019. "Gender and credit risk: a view from the loan officer's desk," Economics Working Papers 1644, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Shusen Qi & Steven Ongena & Hua Cheng, 2022. "Working with women, do men get all the credit?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1427-1447, December.
    11. Ciril Bosch-Rosa & Thomas Meissner & Antoni Bosch-Domènech, 2018. "Cognitive bubbles," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(1), pages 132-153, March.
    12. Zhengyang Bao & Andreas Leibbrandt & ple391, 2019. "Thar she resurges: The case of assets that lack positive fundamental value," Monash Economics Working Papers 12-19, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    13. Lars Hornuf & Johannes Voshaar, 2024. "What Is an Effective Signal in Crowdfunding? Evidence from Expert Researchers and a Meta-Study," CESifo Working Paper Series 11501, CESifo.
    14. Chadi, Adrian & Homolka, Konstantin, 2022. "Little Lies and Blind Eyes – Experimental Evidence on Cheating and Task Performance in Work Groups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 122-159.
    15. Ölkers, Tim & Liu, Shuang & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2023. "A typology of Malian farmers and their credit repayment performance - An unsupervised machine learning approach," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334547, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    16. Cohen-Zada, Danny & Krumer, Alex & Rosenboim, Mosi & Shapir, Offer Moshe, 2017. "Choking under pressure and gender: Evidence from professional tennis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 176-190.
    17. Kaawach, Said & Kowalewski, Oskar & Talavera, Oleksandr, 2024. "Automatic versus manual investing: Role of past performance," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Cao, Qian & Li, Jianbiao & Niu, Xiaofei, 2019. "The role of overconfidence in overweighting private information: Does gender matter?," EconStor Preprints 203448, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Li, Jianbiao & Li, Dahui & Cao, Qian & Niu, Xiaofei, 2018. "The role of regret and disappointment in the repurchase effect: Does gender matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-140.
    20. Dilmaghani, Maryam, 2021. "The gender gap in competitive chess across countries: Commanding queens in command economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 425-441.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:348993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.