IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/347969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do bottom-up and independent agricultural cooperatives really perform better? Insights from a technical efficiency analysis in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Gezahegn, Tafesse W.
  • Passel, Steven Van
  • Berhanu, Tekeste
  • D’haese, Marijke
  • Maertens, Miet

Abstract

The cooperative landscape in Ethiopia is very heterogeneous with a mixture of remains of the pre-1991 government-controlled system and new post-1991 bottom-up collective action initiatives. This heterogeneity, coupled with a large growth in the number of cooperatives in the country, offers an interesting perspective to study the determinants of the (in)efficiency of cooperatives. In this paper, we analyse the performance of Ethiopian agricultural cooperatives, focusing on the degree of technical (in)efficiency and its determinants. We use the stochastic frontier approach in which we account for heteroskedasticity and the monotonicity of production functions, presenting a methodological improvement with respect to previous technical efficiency studies. The results show that NGO- and government-initiated cooperatives are less efficient than community-initiated ones, implying that governments and NGOs should not interfere too strongly in cooperative formation. Cooperatives with a high degree of heterogeneity in members’ participation are found to be about 98% less efficient, while cooperatives that have paid employees are 33% more efficient. Besides, results show that cooperatives in Ethiopia function more efficiently if they incentivize committee members through monetary compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gezahegn, Tafesse W. & Passel, Steven Van & Berhanu, Tekeste & D’haese, Marijke & Maertens, Miet, 2019. "Do bottom-up and independent agricultural cooperatives really perform better? Insights from a technical efficiency analysis in Ethiopia," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(01), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347969
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347969/files/Do%20bottom-up%20and%20independent%20agricultural%20cooperatives%20really%20perform%20better%20%20Insights%20from%20a%20technical%20efficiency%20analysis%20in%20Ethiopia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.