IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/347723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption and impact of fertiliser trees on heterogeneous farmer classified soil types in the Chongwe district of Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Kuntashula, Elias
  • Nhlane, Robert
  • Chisola, Fulayi

Abstract

Adoption of fertiliser trees in Zambia remains very low while efforts to understand the farmers’ decision-making process in embracing sustainable agricultural practices still eludes research. One area not vigorously pursued in understanding the farmers’ adoption process is the role that farmer classification of on-farm soils plays in adoption and impact of sustainable technologies such as the fertiliser trees. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate adoption rates and impact of fertiliser trees on heterogeneous soil types according to farmers’ classifications. Using data randomly collected from 324 households in the 2011 farming season in Chongwe district of Zambia, it was found that farmers were able to classify the dominant soils on their farms into sandy, clay, sand loamy and loamy soils. Most of the farmers (60%) who perceived their soils to be sandy also indicated facing soil fertility challenges. Perception of being on sandy soils was significantly associated with adoption of the fertiliser trees. Propensity score estimates showed that the technology significantly increased maize productivity on soils perceived to be sandy and sand loamy. The non-significant impact results of the technology on relatively perceived high fertile loamy and clay soils could be indicative of diminishing marginal effect of the technology on already fertile soils. Although adoption of the technology on relatively fertile soils is important for fertility sustainability, its promotion on farms with degraded soils could ensure full expression of its potential, and hence, increase its adoptability chances. Targeting of farmers who receive fertiliser tree seedlings should embrace this condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuntashula, Elias & Nhlane, Robert & Chisola, Fulayi, 2018. "Adoption and impact of fertiliser trees on heterogeneous farmer classified soil types in the Chongwe district of Zambia," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 57(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347723
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.347723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/347723/files/Adoption%20and%20impact%20of%20fertiliser%20trees%20on%20heterogeneous%20farmer%20classified%20soil%20types%20in%20the%20Chongwe%20district%20of%20Zambia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.347723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:347723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.