IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/269281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential and Use of Electronic Mail Technology for Conducting Surveys in South Africa: A Case Study Entitled "SA Agri-Success 2000"

Author

Listed:
  • Armour, R. J.
  • Viljoen, M. F.
  • Nell, W. T.

Abstract

The pace of change and development of new technology in the new millennium necessitates fast and efficient data accumulation, processing, interpretation and dissemination to maintain a competitive advantage in any information orientated field. With regards to primary data accumulation, if academic institutions stick to rigid traditional tools and not embrace changes in the information/communications revolution they will face the criticism of further irrelevancy. Traditional academic surveys are also one of the most expensive components of any research project budget. Communication technology advancements, such as electronic mail (e-mail), the Internet and Cellular phone technology such as SMS (Short Messaging Service) and WAP (Wireless Application Protocol), create an opportunity to drastically reduce survey costs and time. The use of e-mail as a potential electronic medium for conducting a survey is discussed in this paper. E-mail was chosen because of the minimal costs involved and the specific market that can be targeted. It does, however, have its own problems and limitations. The key question asked in the e-survey was: "What do South African farmers need to do to survive, and better yet: prosper, in the new millennium?" The focus of this paper is not the answers to this question, but on the methodology, shortfalls, profile of respondents, reply statistics and some netiquette tips used in thee-survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Armour, R. J. & Viljoen, M. F. & Nell, W. T., 2001. "The Potential and Use of Electronic Mail Technology for Conducting Surveys in South Africa: A Case Study Entitled "SA Agri-Success 2000"," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 40(01), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:269281
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269281/files/11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269281/files/11.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.269281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:269281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.