IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/267700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Relevantheid Van Verskillende Tipe Rekords Vir Boerderysukses

Author

Listed:
  • Duvel, G. H.
  • Brockman, H. G.
  • Groenewald, J. A.

Abstract

Against the background problem of general non- or poor recordkeeping, the value and relevance of record keeping is investigated in the context of farming profitability and success. Different types of records were investigated and related to economic measures of success. Although the NFI per ha correlates closely with record-keeping, the results indicate that record-keeping, although important, is not all that predominant and that the degree of sophistication of record-keeping systems is frequently perceived as inappropriate as far as the practical farming management situation is concerned.

Suggested Citation

  • Duvel, G. H. & Brockman, H. G. & Groenewald, J. A., 1994. "Die Relevantheid Van Verskillende Tipe Rekords Vir Boerderysukses," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(01), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267700
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267700/files/agrekon-33-01-005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267700/files/agrekon-33-01-005.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267700?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.