IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/267231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical Tools In Production Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Ortmann, G. F.

Abstract

Some of the major mathematical programming techniques that have been developed since the application of linear programming in farm planning during the early 1950s are evaluated. Most of these models have attempted to incorporate risk, with varying degrees of success. Quadratic programming (QP) is restricted by limited availability of suitable algorithms. MOTAD is computationally efficient and provides acceptable solutions compared with those derived using QP. Utility-efficient programming appears to have considerable potential. Of the safety-first models, Target MOTAD seems to be the most useful. Game theory models may lead to farm plans which are conservative. Risk-efficient Monte Carlo programming may be useful when the distribution of risk is non-normal or utility is not quadratic and when a farmer's risk aversion is not known. Models accounting for stochastic input-output coefficients and constrained resources have also been attempted but required relatively large matrices. Goal programming attempts to include farmers' multiple objectives in the objective function. Development of appropriate software for personal computers should be a high priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortmann, G. F., 1989. "Analytical Tools In Production Economics," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 28(01), February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267231
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267231/files/agrekon-28-01-006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267231/files/agrekon-28-01-006.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.