Author
Abstract
Worms are economically important, being the number one disease in sheep in Australia, and number two (after bloat) in cattle in southern temperate regions of Australia (possibly number one if liver fluke is included). Faecal worm egg counting (WEC) is still the standard diagnostic tool, with useful adjuncts such as the lectin binding assay and the Haemonchus Dipstick Test being tested and deployed in recent years. There has been a shift away from prescriptive, calendar-based strategic worm control programs for sheep to modified strategic programs with an increased emphasis on integrated parasite management and treatments based on worm egg count monitoring rather than visual assessment or the calendar. Use of effective combinations and drench rotation are recommended. Monitoring of drench efficacy by way of post-drench WEC in small and large ruminants and alpaca is recommended. Resistance has worsened during the last 10 years with macrocyclic lactones (MLs) in particular being affected. The prevalence of sheep/goat worm resistance to the MLs is quite high in certain areas. Resistance has been identified as a significant issue in cattle worms in New Zealand, and it appears to be an emerging issue in Australia as well. Two new drench groups have appeared on the horizon in the last two years. One, the AADs (aminoacetonitrile derivatives), represented by monepantel (Zolvix® (Pfizer)) was recently launched in Australia, about 1.5 years after the world launch in New Zealand. Another, the spiroindoles (represented by derquantel, marketed in combination with abamectin as Startect® (Pfizer)), was released in NZ in July 2010. In the past in Australia, first reports of resistance to new drench groups have typically appeared just five years or so after the launch of the new chemicals. Taking measures to manage resistance will hopefully ensure that resistance does not develop so rapidly in the case of the AADs and spiroindoles.
Suggested Citation
Love, Stephen, 2011.
"Worms – what’s new: some recent developments in worm control in ruminants and camelids,"
AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 7(2), pages 1-8, February.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:afbmau:121462
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121462
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:121462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afbmnea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.