IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aergaa/44106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory policy evaluation as an innovative method to improve processes of sustainable rural development

Author

Listed:
  • Bocher, Michael

Abstract

This paper presents an innovative process-orientated self-evaluation method regarding sustainable rural development processes, developed by the University of Göttingen in cooperation with rural actors and a consultant. This method, which is also available online, can be employed by rural development initiatives in order to manage their own work successfully. The paper presents the general evaluation research design and the computer-based method for the self-evaluation of regional development initiatives. It also discuses the potential problems of such a participatory research design which emerged through important empirical findings

Suggested Citation

  • Bocher, Michael, 2006. "Participatory policy evaluation as an innovative method to improve processes of sustainable rural development," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:44106
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.44106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/44106/files/7_1_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.44106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. SHI, Jia & LEE, Ching-Hung & GUO, Xuesong & ZHU, Zhengwei, 2020. "Constructing an integrated stakeholder-based participatory policy evaluation model for urban traffic restriction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:44106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etagrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.