IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeach/352133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Spending on Plant-Based Meat Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Chenarides, Lauren
  • Cuffey, Joel
  • Li, Wenying
  • Zhao, Shuoli
  • Adamo, Brianna

Abstract

It is estimated that the world population will reach 9 billion by 2050 (Boukid, 2021); meeting the food needs of this growing population is a global challenge. Meanwhile, inspired by sustainability and environmental stewardship initiatives, food production practices themselves have begun to shift. The production of alternative proteins is an example of a new production practice that continues to attract the attention of investors, the media, and stakeholders along the food supply chain. Dominating the market for alternative proteins are plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs), which are designed to mimic animal-derived proteins while avoiding some of the environmental impacts of raising animals for meat. In addition to potentially alleviating the effects of the livestock industry on the environment and climate (Boukid, 2021), PBMAs may also lead to improvements in animal welfare and human health. This article describes various aspects pertaining to the current landscape of PBMAs, with a focus on consumer spending patterns and presents insights into the potential role of policy in shaping the market for alternative proteins.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenarides, Lauren & Cuffey, Joel & Li, Wenying & Zhao, Shuoli & Adamo, Brianna, 2025. "Consumer Spending on Plant-Based Meat Alternatives," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(3), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeach:352133
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.352133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/352133/files/Consumer%20Spending%20on%20Plant%20Based%20Meat%20Alternatives.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.352133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeach:352133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.